Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
This question is about what a research technician does and research technician.
No, a research technician is not a scientist. While a research technician is not officially considered a scientist, they actively practice and apply science throughout their daily work.
The meaning of 'scientist' differs from person to person, so depending on who you speak to, you could consider yourself a scientist, though salary-wise, you may not feel like one.
Some people argue that anyone who is actively practicing science and is applying the scientific method could be considered a scientist, though this would not award you the title of one in a laboratory environment.
The main distinction between a research technician and a scientist is that a scientist researches and develops new methods, whereas a technician implements those methods.
Given this distinction, a scientist would be someone who is actively developing a new procedure to test for specific disease strains and ways to combat them, whereas a research technician would be the person who uses these newly created protocols to test such samples.
In other words, a scientist creates their work, whereas a research technician works on said creations.

Zippia allows you to choose from different easy-to-use templates, and provides you with expert advice. Using the templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.