Working At Cerner

There isn't an effective way unless your managers actions are outright belligerent. I discovered this when I left cerner and talked to HR about my reasons why. No *** were given even though current associates still voice their grievances. Though, being that the Trump admin basically killed much of the viability surround the EU-US datashield , I see a number of global teams ceasing to exist - at least on the US side. Furthermore, I'm stuck working with cwx central on my new job, and I had to deal with a new associate who couldn't figure out how to copy and paste while listening to his exec stumble to answer why a, we were working with someone new every other month; b, why contractual obligations were not being met (while Cerner tries to get us to sign away even more rights) and c, why they think it's OK to cover things up, specifically mistakes that result in downtime. All in all, I see us leaving for epic or mckesson in a few years. Oh, and what happened to Printer City? I knew Sean, the creator, just before he left, but when I asked for the software so that we could speed things up, they didn't want to talk about it or share it even though we're allowed to build our own printers.

I've seen the Print City source code. It was great but had several problems that I can't/won't divulge. The fact that it was written by one guy who then left is enough to keep us from putting it into a client's hands without a significant amount of rework. Then there's the issue of, who supports it? What mnemonic are you working under now so I can look up their CCO and laugh?

Your AR partner will probably listen but if it's not unethical they would likely be powerless. Your executive might care but you should also be ready to transfer out at that point in case it just dumps more gas on the fire. To the extent that you feel comfortable sharing, what's making it feel toxic?

> what's making it feel toxic? * Conflicting information given (reviews, expectations, instructions, SOP, etc.) * Unclear working hours * Unclear development quality expectations * Heavily opinionated annual review metrics * Not given factors that we're measured on for annual reviews * Favorites; opportunities given to some, and not others * Told to follow Wiki / uCern instructions when asking for advice * "talked-to" when following wiki instructions (most are outdated / incorrect) * Told to only report *billable* hours * Some associates can work from home while others cannot * Chinese telephone method used to deliver messages from management * Team meetings are unclear, outdated * Told to "book conference rooms to socialize" * Not given more work when requesting more * Some associated given choice projects regardless of skill * 1:1 meetings useless, used to review task completion * Upcoming: precise time logging salary employee ... And the list goes on.