Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Chadbourne & Parke history
Chadbourne & Parke company history timeline
In 1909 Chadbourne was joined by Arthur Shores.
1909: The partnership of Chadbourne & Shores is organized.
After Shores left the partnership in 1918, the firm became known as Chadbourne, Babbitt, & Wallace with the addition of New York lawyer Kurnal Babbit and William Wallace, Jr., a formerly prominent Montana lawyer.
1918: Chadbourne, Babbitt & Wallace is started.
William M. Parke, later a name partner, came into the firm as part of the 1924 acquisition.
When Thomas Chadbourne wrote his autobiography in 1928, he claimed his law firm of 38 lawyers brought in more than $2 million in annual receipts.
In 1928 the Chadbourne partnership represented over 150 major corporations, and Thomas Chadbourne was one of New York City's top corporate lawyers and businessmen.
Chadbourne's plan was adopted in Brussels in 1931.
1935: Firm opens its Washington, D.C. office.
Unfortunately, the firm lost a name partner in 1936 with the departure of Louis S. Levy.
In 1939 Levy was disbarred and Judge Manton was convicted of judicial corruption.
In its February 1958 issue, Fortune wrote about how the big Wall Street law firms operated.
1984: Partnership is renamed Chadbourne & Parke; Los Angeles branch office is established.
However, the firm's finances improved with gross revenues increasing to $75 million in 1989, making it the nation's 57th largest law firm.
After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, several large law firms, including Chadbourne & Parke, established Moscow offices to help companies invest in Russia and the other former Soviet countries.
The plaintiff originally had sued American Tobacco Company, which was acquired by Brown & Williamson in 1995.
The Wall Street Journal on April 23, 1998 said the allegation was that the tobacco 'firms participated in a conspiracy to deceive the public.' Industry lawyers replied that they were just doing their job in defending their clients.
By early 1998 Chadbourne had hired seven partners and one senior associate from the smaller firm that had about 85 lawyers before these defections.
Built on the legacy left by Thomas Chadbourne and other early partners who served American clients, the much larger firm of Chadbourne & Parke in 2000 served not only American but global clients, often in legal specialties that did not even exist years ago.
Rate Chadbourne & Parke's efforts to communicate its history to employees.
Chadbourne & Parke jobs
Do you work at Chadbourne & Parke?
Does Chadbourne & Parke communicate its history to new hires?
Chadbourne & Parke competitors
| Company name | Founded date | Revenue | Employee size | Job openings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cadwalader | 1792 | $452.6M | 1,280 | - |
| McDermott Will & Emery | 1934 | $1.1B | 2,300 | 100 |
| Covington & Burling | 1919 | $330.0M | 1,600 | 21 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1909 | $4.8B | 5,721 | 99 |
| Davis Polk & Wardwell | 1849 | $1.8B | 1,500 | - |
| King & Spalding | 1885 | $1.3B | 1,927 | 33 |
| Ropes & Gray | 1865 | $2.1B | 1,375 | 76 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | 1879 | $1.1B | 1,931 | - |
| Jones Day | 1893 | $2.1B | 6,097 | - |
| Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale | 1918 | $1.2B | - | - |
Chadbourne & Parke history FAQs
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of Chadbourne & Parke, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about Chadbourne & Parke. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at Chadbourne & Parke. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by Chadbourne & Parke. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of Chadbourne & Parke and its employees or that of Zippia.
Chadbourne & Parke may also be known as or be related to Chadbourne & Parke, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Chadbourne & Parke Llp, Chadbourne & Parke, L.L.P. and Chadbourne Cut & Co.