Best cities for a communications engineer
The best cities for communications engineers are Santa Ana, CA, Lubbock, TX, and San Antonio, TX, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for communications engineers vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for communications engineers in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a communications engineer or considering a move, this list of the best cities for communications engineers to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for communications engineers. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a communications engineer. While the absolute best city for communications engineers is Santa Ana, CA, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for communications engineers in 2024.
If you're looking for a communications engineer job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for communications engineers in 2025
1. Santa Ana, CA
Total communications engineer jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $111,379 Lowest 10 percent warn: $80,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $153,000 Location quotient: 11.83 2. Lubbock, TX
Total communications engineer jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $89,722 Lowest 10 percent warn: $66,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $120,000 Location quotient: 13.18 3. San Antonio, TX
Total communications engineer jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $91,670 Lowest 10 percent warn: $67,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $123,000 Location quotient: 2.01 4. Houston, TX
Total communications engineer jobs: 12 Average annual salary: $91,358 Lowest 10 percent warn: $67,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $123,000 Location quotient: 2.10 5. Arlington, TX
Total communications engineer jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $89,090 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $120,000 Location quotient: 8.21 6. San Francisco, CA
Total communications engineer jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $124,218 Lowest 10 percent warn: $88,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $173,000 Location quotient: 0.00 7. Oakland, CA
Total communications engineer jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $123,969 Lowest 10 percent warn: $88,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $173,000 Location quotient: 0.00 8. Fremont, CA
Total communications engineer jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $123,663 Lowest 10 percent warn: $88,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $173,000 Location quotient: 0.00 9. San Jose, CA
Total communications engineer jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $123,516 Lowest 10 percent warn: $88,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $172,000 Location quotient: 0.00 10. Fort Worth, TX
Total communications engineer jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $89,109 Lowest 10 percent warn: $66,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $120,000 Location quotient: 3.57
Choose from 10+ customizable communications engineer resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use communications engineer resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your communications engineer resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for communications engineers
- Santa Ana, CA
- Lubbock, TX
- San Antonio, TX
- Houston, TX
- Arlington, TX
- San Francisco, CA
- Oakland, CA
- Fremont, CA
- San Jose, CA
- Fort Worth, TX
- (3 communications engineer jobs)
- (2 communications engineer jobs)
- (3 communications engineer jobs)
- (12 communications engineer jobs)
- (2 communications engineer jobs)
- (0 communications engineer jobs)
- (0 communications engineer jobs)
- (0 communications engineer jobs)
- (0 communications engineer jobs)
- (3 communications engineer jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a communications engineer
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santa Ana, CA | $111,379 | $80,000 | 334,217 | 3 |
| 2 | Lubbock, TX | $89,722 | $66,000 | 252,506 | 2 |
| 3 | San Antonio, TX | $91,670 | $67,000 | 1,492,510 | 3 |
| 4 | Houston, TX | $91,358 | $67,000 | 2,303,482 | 12 |
| 5 | Arlington, TX | $89,090 | $65,000 | 392,772 | 2 |
| 6 | San Francisco, CA | $124,218 | $88,000 | 870,887 | - |
| 7 | Oakland, CA | $123,969 | $88,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 8 | Fremont, CA | $123,663 | $88,000 | 233,136 | - |
| 9 | San Jose, CA | $123,516 | $88,000 | 1,025,350 | - |
| 10 | Fort Worth, TX | $89,109 | $66,000 | 854,113 | 3 |
| 11 | Irvine, CA | $110,995 | $80,000 | 266,122 | 3 |
| 12 | Laredo, TX | $92,012 | $68,000 | 257,156 | - |
| 13 | Corpus Christi, TX | $92,011 | $68,000 | 325,733 | - |
| 14 | Stockton, CA | $122,822 | $87,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 15 | Tucson, AZ | $89,469 | $66,000 | 530,706 | 7 |
| 16 | Sacramento, CA | $122,364 | $87,000 | 495,234 | - |
| 17 | Colorado Springs, CO | $92,819 | $68,000 | 465,101 | 42 |
| 18 | El Paso, TX | $91,510 | $68,000 | 683,080 | - |
| 19 | Detroit, MI | $89,652 | $66,000 | 672,795 | - |
| 20 | Fresno, CA | $121,009 | $86,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 21 | Los Angeles, CA | $113,204 | $81,000 | 3,976,322 | 3 |
| 22 | Bakersfield, CA | $117,996 | $84,000 | 376,380 | - |
| 23 | Boston, MA | $101,402 | $74,000 | 673,184 | 4 |
| 24 | Austin, TX | $91,237 | $67,000 | 947,890 | - |
| 25 | Pittsburgh, PA | $81,275 | $59,000 | 303,625 | 22 |
| 26 | Raleigh, NC | $88,108 | $64,000 | 458,880 | 2 |
| 27 | Phoenix, AZ | $91,393 | $67,000 | 1,615,017 | 3 |
| 28 | Nashville, TN | $77,943 | $58,000 | 660,388 | 10 |
| 29 | Norfolk, VA | $98,018 | $72,000 | 245,115 | 2 |
| 30 | Anaheim, CA | $111,767 | $80,000 | 351,043 | - |
| 31 | Long Beach, CA | $111,987 | $81,000 | 470,130 | - |
| 32 | Glendale, AZ | $91,422 | $67,000 | 245,895 | - |
| 33 | Riverside, CA | $111,252 | $80,000 | 324,722 | - |
| 34 | Newark, NJ | $93,172 | $68,000 | 281,764 | 5 |
| 35 | Scottsdale, AZ | $91,362 | $67,000 | 246,645 | - |
| 36 | Albuquerque, NM | $83,348 | $61,000 | 559,277 | 5 |
| 37 | Aurora, CO | $92,477 | $68,000 | 361,710 | 4 |
| 38 | North Las Vegas, NV | $77,579 | $55,000 | 238,702 | 4 |
| 39 | Plano, TX | $88,541 | $65,000 | 286,057 | 2 |
| 40 | Mesa, AZ | $90,826 | $67,000 | 484,587 | - |
| 41 | Durham, NC | $87,982 | $64,000 | 263,016 | - |
| 42 | San Diego, CA | $106,755 | $78,000 | 1,406,630 | 7 |
| 43 | Chandler, AZ | $90,771 | $67,000 | 247,477 | - |
| 44 | Dallas, TX | $88,927 | $65,000 | 1,317,929 | - |
| 45 | Irving, TX | $88,881 | $65,000 | 238,289 | - |
| 46 | Gilbert, AZ | $90,709 | $67,000 | 237,133 | - |
| 47 | Garland, TX | $88,683 | $65,000 | 234,943 | - |
| 48 | Oklahoma City, OK | $80,836 | $60,000 | 638,367 | 3 |
| 49 | Washington, DC | $103,557 | $75,000 | 681,170 | 20 |
| 50 | Greensboro, NC | $87,296 | $64,000 | 287,027 | - |
Highest paying cities for communications engineers
| Rank | City | Avg. communications engineer salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palo Alto, CA | $123,897 |
| 2 | Washington, DC | $103,557 |
| 3 | Boston, MA | $101,402 |
| 4 | Baltimore, MD | $100,280 |
| 5 | Arlington, VA | $97,358 |
| 6 | Colorado Springs, CO | $92,819 |
| 7 | Phoenix, AZ | $91,393 |
| 8 | Houston, TX | $91,358 |
| 9 | Seattle, WA | $88,207 |
| 10 | Albuquerque, NM | $83,348 |
| 11 | Philadelphia, PA | $83,311 |
| 12 | Minneapolis, MN | $80,467 |
| 13 | Atlanta, GA | $79,948 |
| 14 | New York, NY | $79,088 |
| 15 | Las Vegas, NV | $77,737 |
| 16 | Des Plaines, IL | $77,318 |
| 17 | Baton Rouge, LA | $75,954 |
| 18 | Miami, FL | $70,297 |
| 19 | Cincinnati, OH | $68,733 |
Communications engineer best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common architecture and engineering questions.
Search for communications engineer jobs
Updated January 8, 2025