Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Cummings & Lockwood main competitors are Day Pitney, Allen Matkins, and Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
Competitor Summary. See how Cummings & Lockwood compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1909 | 4.7 | Stamford, CT | 5 | $84.9M | 350 | |
| 1845 | 4.6 | Hartford, CT | 6 | $38.0M | 526 | |
| 1936 | 4.2 | Hartford, CT | 5 | $20.0M | 223 | |
| 1919 | 4.0 | Hartford, CT | 2 | $12.0M | 200 | |
| 1919 | 4.1 | Bridgeport, CT | 4 | $17.0M | 173 | |
| 1934 | 4.6 | New Haven, CT | 11 | $42.0M | 200 | |
| 2007 | 4.9 | New York, NY | 11 | $100.0M | 950 | |
Finn Dixon & Herling | 1987 | 4.1 | Stamford, CT | 1 | $8.2M | 20 |
| 1902 | 4.3 | Waterbury, CT | 5 | $17.1M | 50 | |
| 1940 | 4.9 | Indianapolis, IN | 18 | $240.0M | 1,625 | |
| 1938 | 4.9 | Phoenix, AZ | 7 | $150.0M | 1,000 | |
| 1983 | 4.3 | Los Angeles, CA | 5 | $16.0M | 200 | |
| 1925 | 4.1 | West Palm Beach, FL | 1 | $21.4M | 480 | |
| - | 4.2 | Los Angeles, CA | 1 | $7.9M | 85 | |
| 1973 | 4.7 | New York, NY | 12 | $73.0M | 50 | |
| 1945 | 4.9 | Washington, DC | 11 | $1.0B | 1,800 | |
| 1977 | 4.9 | Los Angeles, CA | 4 | $161.2M | 200 | |
Ruden Mcclosky | - | 4.1 | - | - | - | - |
| 1875 | 3.9 | Salt Lake City, UT | 2 | $11.7M | 100 | |
| 1927 | 4.9 | Los Angeles, CA | 6 | $867.0M | 1,800 | |
| 1933 | 4.3 | Baltimore, MD | 13 | $29.0M | 350 |
Rate how well Cummings & Lockwood differentiates itself from its competitors.
| Company | Average salary | Hourly salary | Salary score |
|---|---|---|---|
Cummings & Lockwood | $68,552 | $32.96 | - |
Robinson+Cole | $57,118 | $27.46 | - |
Murtha Cullina | $53,073 | $25.52 | - |
Shipman & Goodwin | $53,202 | $25.58 | - |
Pullman & Comley | $51,132 | $24.58 | - |
Wiggin and Dana | $63,610 | $30.58 | - |
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Cummings & Lockwood | $63,640 | $30.60 |
Allen Matkins | $76,891 | $36.97 |
wtplaw | $66,811 | $32.12 |
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones | $65,164 | $31.33 |
Wolf, Rifkin, Shapiro, Schulman & Rabkin, Llp | $62,965 | $30.27 |
Barnes & Thornburg | $55,755 | $26.81 |
Snell & Wilmer | $51,904 | $24.95 |
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld | $50,040 | $24.06 |
Day Pitney | $44,859 | $21.57 |
Robinson+Cole | $41,005 | $19.71 |
Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey | $40,397 | $19.42 |
Finn Dixon & Herling | $39,711 | $19.09 |
Wiggin and Dana | $37,699 | $18.12 |
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton | $36,830 | $17.71 |
Ruden Mcclosky | $35,885 | $17.25 |
Murtha Cullina | $35,428 | $17.03 |
Shipman & Goodwin | $33,587 | $16.15 |
Jones Waldo | $33,462 | $16.09 |
Pullman & Comley | $32,305 | $15.53 |
Gunster | $32,242 | $15.50 |
Do you work at Cummings & Lockwood?
Does Cummings & Lockwood effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Shipman & Goodwin | 33% | 67% |
| Cummings & Lockwood | 35% | 65% |
| Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld | 40% | 60% |
| wtplaw | 41% | 59% |
| Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton | 46% | 54% |
| Day Pitney | 47% | 53% |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61% | 21% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 9.5 | |
| 55% | 16% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 9.9 | |
| 62% | 19% | 9% | 7% | 3% | 9.7 | |
| 51% | 24% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 9.9 | |
| 68% | 13% | 10% | 6% | 2% | 9.3 | |
| 51% | 10% | 24% | 11% | 4% | 9.6 |