Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Best states for a dimensional integration engineer
- Rank 1 - 10
- 11 - 20
- 21 - 30
- 31 - 40
- 41 - 51
It seems like dimensional integration engineers are becoming more and more common across America. But working conditions and demand for dimensional integration engineers aren't the same everywhere in the U.S. Pay, benefits, and opportunities vary greatly by state, and it's no different for dimensional integration engineers. We found that Oregon is the best state in the nation for dimensional integration engineers, and people in Eureka earn the most in the field.
We figured that the best places for dimensional integration engineer jobs has three things everyone would agree on. There would be high annual wages, good career prospects (no matter what phase of the career you are in), and a lot of job opportunities.We found that the Midwest is best for dimensional integration engineers, and the Northeast is the worst. Foster City, CA is the best city in the country for dimensional integration engineer jobs, where as Oregon is the best state in the country.
10 best states for dimensional integration engineers in 2025
1. Oregon
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 775 Average annual salary: $102,291 Lowest 10 percent earn: $71,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $146,000 Location Quotient: 1.54
2. California
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 6,841 Average annual salary: $107,566 Lowest 10 percent earn: $73,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $157,000 Location Quotient: 1.93
3. Connecticut
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 394 Average annual salary: $102,969 Lowest 10 percent earn: $70,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $151,000 Location Quotient: 0.98
4. Maryland
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 1,156 Average annual salary: $99,732 Lowest 10 percent earn: $68,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $145,000 Location Quotient: 1.5
5. District of Columbia
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 409 Average annual salary: $101,047 Lowest 10 percent earn: $69,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $147,000 Location Quotient: 2.01
6. Washington
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 1,393 Average annual salary: $94,355 Lowest 10 percent earn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $135,000 Location Quotient: 1.57
7. Massachusetts
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 1,429 Average annual salary: $95,408 Lowest 10 percent earn: $64,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $141,000 Location Quotient: 1.28
8. New York
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 1,457 Average annual salary: $98,694 Lowest 10 percent earn: $67,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $144,000 Location Quotient: 0.93
9. Nevada
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 185 Average annual salary: $97,838 Lowest 10 percent earn: $66,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $143,000 Location Quotient: 0.73
10. Michigan
Total dimensional integration engineer jobs: 942 Average annual salary: $86,799 Lowest 10 percent earn: $60,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $125,000 Location Quotient: 1
Dimensional integration engineer jobsNear Columbus, OH
How Zippia determines the best states to be a dimensional integration engineer
You can read about how the best state rankings are calculated here.
Detailed list of the best states for a dimensional integration engineer
| Rank | State | Average salary | Lowest 10% earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oregon | $102,291 | $71,000 | 4,142,776 | 775 |
| 2 | California | $107,566 | $73,000 | 39,536,653 | 6,841 |
| 3 | Connecticut | $102,969 | $70,000 | 3,588,184 | 394 |
| 4 | Maryland | $99,732 | $68,000 | 6,052,177 | 1,156 |
| 5 | District of Columbia | $101,047 | $69,000 | 693,972 | 409 |
| 6 | Washington | $94,355 | $65,000 | 7,405,743 | 1,393 |
| 7 | Massachusetts | $95,408 | $64,000 | 6,859,819 | 1,429 |
| 8 | New York | $98,694 | $67,000 | 19,849,399 | 1,457 |
| 9 | Nevada | $97,838 | $66,000 | 2,998,039 | 185 |
| 10 | Michigan | $86,799 | $60,000 | 9,962,311 | 942 |
| 11 | Colorado | $90,360 | $61,000 | 5,607,154 | 1,085 |
| 12 | Texas | $87,185 | $58,000 | 28,304,596 | 2,301 |
| 13 | New Jersey | $98,644 | $67,000 | 9,005,644 | 674 |
| 14 | Louisiana | $94,652 | $62,000 | 4,684,333 | 192 |
| 15 | New Mexico | $91,111 | $62,000 | 2,088,070 | 166 |
| 16 | Alaska | $89,479 | $65,000 | 739,795 | 88 |
| 17 | Arizona | $84,451 | $58,000 | 7,016,270 | 854 |
| 18 | Georgia | $87,969 | $57,000 | 10,429,379 | 931 |
| 19 | Virginia | $84,533 | $57,000 | 8,470,020 | 1,809 |
| 20 | Pennsylvania | $87,886 | $60,000 | 12,805,537 | 917 |
| 21 | North Carolina | $85,365 | $57,000 | 10,273,419 | 920 |
| 22 | West Virginia | $84,297 | $57,000 | 1,815,857 | 103 |
| 23 | South Carolina | $86,802 | $57,000 | 5,024,369 | 273 |
| 24 | Illinois | $83,574 | $58,000 | 12,802,023 | 1,254 |
| 25 | Ohio | $83,186 | $57,000 | 11,658,609 | 697 |
| 26 | Rhode Island | $83,457 | $56,000 | 1,059,639 | 120 |
| 27 | Florida | $82,838 | $52,000 | 20,984,400 | 1,517 |
| 28 | Delaware | $80,567 | $55,000 | 961,939 | 183 |
| 29 | Alabama | $78,878 | $51,000 | 4,874,747 | 450 |
| 30 | Idaho | $79,317 | $54,000 | 1,716,943 | 169 |
| 31 | Indiana | $78,530 | $54,000 | 6,666,818 | 595 |
| 32 | New Hampshire | $77,614 | $52,000 | 1,342,795 | 175 |
| 33 | Utah | $74,840 | $50,000 | 3,101,833 | 422 |
| 34 | Tennessee | $78,548 | $52,000 | 6,715,984 | 305 |
| 35 | Minnesota | $72,263 | $51,000 | 5,576,606 | 715 |
| 36 | Oklahoma | $77,494 | $52,000 | 3,930,864 | 153 |
| 37 | Wyoming | $70,855 | $48,000 | 579,315 | 63 |
| 38 | Vermont | $69,615 | $46,000 | 623,657 | 93 |
| 39 | Maine | $75,451 | $50,000 | 1,335,907 | 94 |
| 40 | North Dakota | $70,348 | $50,000 | 755,393 | 89 |
| 41 | Wisconsin | $72,196 | $50,000 | 5,795,483 | 427 |
| 42 | Kansas | $72,661 | $49,000 | 2,913,123 | 221 |
| 43 | Nebraska | $70,103 | $48,000 | 1,920,076 | 185 |
| 44 | Iowa | $67,581 | $47,000 | 3,145,711 | 324 |
| 45 | Hawaii | $61,773 | $45,000 | 1,427,538 | 91 |
| 46 | Montana | $65,266 | $45,000 | 1,050,493 | 115 |
| 47 | Missouri | $69,893 | $47,000 | 6,113,532 | 438 |
| 48 | Mississippi | $69,526 | $45,000 | 2,984,100 | 86 |
| 49 | Kentucky | $67,778 | $46,000 | 4,454,189 | 205 |
| 50 | South Dakota | $64,884 | $45,000 | 869,666 | 61 |
| 51 | Arkansas | $61,325 | $41,000 | 3,004,279 | 168 |
Highest paying states for dimensional integration engineers
| Rank | State | Avg. Dimensional Integration Engineer Salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oregon | $102,291 |
| 2 | California | $107,566 |
| 3 | Connecticut | $102,969 |
| 4 | Maryland | $99,732 |
| 5 | District of Columbia | $101,047 |
| 6 | Washington | $94,355 |
| 7 | Massachusetts | $95,408 |
| 8 | New York | $98,694 |
| 9 | Nevada | $97,838 |
| 10 | Michigan | $86,799 |
| 11 | Colorado | $90,360 |
| 12 | Texas | $87,185 |
| 13 | New Jersey | $98,644 |
| 14 | Louisiana | $94,652 |
| 15 | New Mexico | $91,111 |
| 16 | Alaska | $89,479 |
| 17 | Arizona | $84,451 |
| 18 | Georgia | $87,969 |
| 19 | Virginia | $84,533 |
| 20 | Pennsylvania | $87,886 |
| 21 | North Carolina | $85,365 |
| 22 | West Virginia | $84,297 |
| 23 | South Carolina | $86,802 |
| 24 | Illinois | $83,574 |
| 25 | Ohio | $83,186 |
| 26 | Rhode Island | $83,457 |
| 27 | Florida | $82,838 |
| 28 | Delaware | $80,567 |
| 29 | Alabama | $78,878 |
| 30 | Idaho | $79,317 |
| 31 | Indiana | $78,530 |
| 32 | New Hampshire | $77,614 |
| 33 | Utah | $74,840 |
| 34 | Tennessee | $78,548 |
| 35 | Minnesota | $72,263 |
| 36 | Oklahoma | $77,494 |
| 37 | Wyoming | $70,855 |
| 38 | Vermont | $69,615 |
| 39 | Maine | $75,451 |
| 40 | North Dakota | $70,348 |
| 41 | Wisconsin | $72,196 |
| 42 | Kansas | $72,661 |
| 43 | Nebraska | $70,103 |
| 44 | Iowa | $67,581 |
| 45 | Hawaii | $61,773 |
| 46 | Montana | $65,266 |
| 47 | Missouri | $69,893 |
| 48 | Mississippi | $69,526 |
| 49 | Kentucky | $67,778 |
| 50 | South Dakota | $64,884 |
| 51 | Arkansas | $61,325 |
Dimensional integration engineer best states FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common architecture and engineering questions.
Search for dimensional integration engineer jobs
Updated January 8, 2025