Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Competitor Summary. See how Eastman & Smith compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1844 | 3.5 | Toledo, OH | 1 | $12.0M | 127 | |
| 1906 | 3.9 | Boston, MA | 7 | $8.4M | 200 | |
| - | 4.4 | Newport Beach, CA | 1 | $35.7M | 100 | |
| 1792 | 4.9 | New York, NY | 3 | $452.6M | 1,280 | |
| 1897 | 4.9 | Columbia, SC | 14 | $340.0M | 1,797 | |
| 1907 | 4.8 | Portland, OR | 5 | $236.5M | 723 | |
| 1910 | 4.5 | Indianapolis, IN | 6 | $133.0M | 818 | |
| 1868 | 4.2 | New Providence, NJ | 1 | $7.5M | 64 | |
| 1919 | 4.1 | Bridgeport, CT | 4 | $17.0M | 173 | |
| 1930 | 3.8 | Baltimore, MD | 2 | $8.5M | 75 | |
| 1957 | 3.8 | Milwaukee, WI | 5 | $5.0M | 100 | |
Zimmerman, Axelrad, Meyer, Stern & Wise, P.C. | - | 3.7 | Houston, TX | 1 | $1.5M | 20 |
| 1934 | 4.5 | Chicago, IL | 15 | $217.0M | 1,010 | |
| 1936 | 4.5 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $37.5M | 350 | |
| 1951 | 4.1 | Bridgeport, CT | 3 | $11.6M | 50 | |
| - | 4.0 | San Francisco, CA | 1 | $27.7M | 350 | |
| 1934 | 3.8 | Short Hills, NJ | 1 | $2.6M | 125 | |
| 1939 | 3.8 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $9.4M | 71 | |
| 2000 | 4.2 | Scottsdale, AZ | 1 | $1.5M | 30 | |
| 1975 | 4.5 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $56.3M | 200 | |
| 1992 | 4.1 | Dallas, TX | 7 | $12.8M | 100 |
Rate Eastman & Smith's competitiveness in the market.
| Company | Average salary | Hourly salary | Salary score |
|---|---|---|---|
Eastman & Smith | $52,405 | $25.19 | - |
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Eastman & Smith | $29,403 | $14.14 |
Cadwalader | $52,168 | $25.08 |
Stoel Rives | $51,389 | $24.71 |
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | $47,174 | $22.68 |
Ice Miller | $41,140 | $19.78 |
Hinckley Allen | $39,454 | $18.97 |
Newmeyer & Dillion | $37,849 | $18.20 |
Rose Law Group | $37,517 | $18.04 |
Zimmerman, Axelrad, Meyer, Stern & Wise, P.C. | $37,488 | $18.02 |
Tydings & Rosenberg | $37,383 | $17.97 |
Budd Larner | $36,487 | $17.54 |
Morris Polich & Purdy LLP | $35,970 | $17.29 |
Hinshaw & Culbertson | $34,309 | $16.49 |
Cohen and Wolf | $34,204 | $16.44 |
Godfrey & Kahn | $33,665 | $16.18 |
DeHay & Elliston | $33,510 | $16.11 |
Johnson & Bell | $32,349 | $15.55 |
Pullman & Comley | $31,112 | $14.96 |
Clausen Miller P.C. | $30,375 | $14.60 |
Martindale-Hubbell | $30,331 | $14.58 |
Do you work at Eastman & Smith?
Does Eastman & Smith effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Cohen and Wolf | 22% | 78% |
| Hinckley Allen | 28% | 72% |
| Tydings & Rosenberg | 33% | 67% |
| Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough | 34% | 66% |
| Ice Miller | 52% | 48% |
| Eastman & Smith | - | - |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69% | 12% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 9.9 | |
| 60% | 11% | 20% | 6% | 2% | 9.8 | |
| 71% | 11% | 8% | 7% | 3% | 9.2 | |
| 68% | 18% | 9% | 4% | 2% | 8.7 | |
| 54% | 12% | 23% | 9% | 2% | 7.7 | |
| 49% | 23% | 14% | 11% | 3% | 8.0 |