Best cities for a facilities project manager
The best cities for facilities project managers are Albuquerque, NM, Oakland, CA, and Columbus, OH, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for facilities project managers vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for facilities project managers in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a facilities project manager or considering a move, this list of the best cities for facilities project managers to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for facilities project managers. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a facilities project manager. While the absolute best city for facilities project managers is Albuquerque, NM, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for facilities project managers in 2024.
If you're looking for a facilities project manager job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for facilities project managers in 2025
1. Albuquerque, NM
Total facilities project manager jobs: 4 Average annual salary: $89,206 Lowest 10 percent warn: $60,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $131,000 Location quotient: 2.67 2. Oakland, CA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $102,790 Lowest 10 percent warn: $67,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $155,000 Location quotient: 2.80 3. Columbus, OH
Total facilities project manager jobs: 13 Average annual salary: $78,435 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $112,000 Location quotient: 2.60 4. Sacramento, CA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 7 Average annual salary: $101,660 Lowest 10 percent warn: $66,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $154,000 Location quotient: 2.99 5. Long Beach, CA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 4 Average annual salary: $95,674 Lowest 10 percent warn: $64,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $141,000 Location quotient: 5.84 6. Riverside, CA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 8 Average annual salary: $95,071 Lowest 10 percent warn: $64,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $141,000 Location quotient: 11.93 7. Lubbock, TX
Total facilities project manager jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $76,056 Lowest 10 percent warn: $51,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $111,000 Location quotient: 5.97 8. Anaheim, CA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $95,488 Lowest 10 percent warn: $64,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $141,000 Location quotient: 3.52 9. Philadelphia, PA
Total facilities project manager jobs: 10 Average annual salary: $76,741 Lowest 10 percent warn: $53,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $109,000 Location quotient: 1.84 10. Madison, WI
Total facilities project manager jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $80,137 Lowest 10 percent warn: $55,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $115,000 Location quotient: 1.47
Choose from 10+ customizable facilities project manager resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use facilities project manager resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your facilities project manager resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for facilities project managers
- Albuquerque, NM
- Oakland, CA
- Columbus, OH
- Sacramento, CA
- Long Beach, CA
- Riverside, CA
- Lubbock, TX
- Anaheim, CA
- Philadelphia, PA
- Madison, WI
- (4 facilities project manager jobs)
- (3 facilities project manager jobs)
- (13 facilities project manager jobs)
- (7 facilities project manager jobs)
- (4 facilities project manager jobs)
- (8 facilities project manager jobs)
- (2 facilities project manager jobs)
- (2 facilities project manager jobs)
- (10 facilities project manager jobs)
- (3 facilities project manager jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a facilities project manager
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albuquerque, NM | $89,206 | $60,000 | 559,277 | 4 |
| 2 | Oakland, CA | $102,790 | $67,000 | 420,005 | 3 |
| 3 | Columbus, OH | $78,435 | $54,000 | 860,090 | 13 |
| 4 | Sacramento, CA | $101,660 | $66,000 | 495,234 | 7 |
| 5 | Long Beach, CA | $95,674 | $64,000 | 470,130 | 4 |
| 6 | Riverside, CA | $95,071 | $64,000 | 324,722 | 8 |
| 7 | Lubbock, TX | $76,056 | $51,000 | 252,506 | 2 |
| 8 | Anaheim, CA | $95,488 | $64,000 | 351,043 | 2 |
| 9 | Philadelphia, PA | $76,741 | $53,000 | 1,567,872 | 10 |
| 10 | Madison, WI | $80,137 | $55,000 | 252,551 | 3 |
| 11 | Raleigh, NC | $86,219 | $60,000 | 458,880 | 1 |
| 12 | Charlotte, NC | $83,752 | $58,000 | 842,051 | 4 |
| 13 | Austin, TX | $76,521 | $52,000 | 947,890 | 18 |
| 14 | El Paso, TX | $77,820 | $53,000 | 683,080 | 1 |
| 15 | Durham, NC | $86,152 | $60,000 | 263,016 | - |
| 16 | Milwaukee, WI | $80,773 | $55,000 | 595,047 | 1 |
| 17 | Los Angeles, CA | $96,388 | $64,000 | 3,976,322 | 14 |
| 18 | Greensboro, NC | $85,442 | $59,000 | 287,027 | - |
| 19 | Winston-Salem, NC | $85,008 | $59,000 | 242,203 | - |
| 20 | Cleveland, OH | $79,863 | $55,000 | 385,809 | - |
| 21 | San Francisco, CA | $103,029 | $67,000 | 870,887 | 2 |
| 22 | Fremont, CA | $102,488 | $67,000 | 233,136 | 1 |
| 23 | San Antonio, TX | $76,459 | $52,000 | 1,492,510 | 6 |
| 24 | Toledo, OH | $78,802 | $54,000 | 278,508 | - |
| 25 | Houston, TX | $76,069 | $52,000 | 2,303,482 | 21 |
| 26 | Pittsburgh, PA | $75,499 | $52,000 | 303,625 | 3 |
| 27 | San Jose, CA | $102,352 | $67,000 | 1,025,350 | 1 |
| 28 | Detroit, MI | $79,596 | $54,000 | 672,795 | - |
| 29 | Cincinnati, OH | $76,755 | $53,000 | 298,800 | - |
| 30 | New York, NY | $94,087 | $65,000 | 8,537,673 | 12 |
| 31 | Stockton, CA | $101,669 | $66,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 32 | Irvine, CA | $95,019 | $64,000 | 266,122 | 3 |
| 33 | Hempstead, NY | $94,180 | $65,000 | 759,757 | - |
| 34 | Islip, NY | $94,118 | $65,000 | 335,543 | - |
| 35 | Fort Wayne, IN | $66,101 | $46,000 | 264,488 | 3 |
| 36 | Fresno, CA | $100,000 | $66,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 37 | Seattle, WA | $78,357 | $51,000 | 704,352 | 18 |
| 38 | Oyster Bay, NY | $93,950 | $65,000 | 293,214 | - |
| 39 | Brookhaven, NY | $93,914 | $65,000 | 486,040 | - |
| 40 | Reno, NV | $77,602 | $51,000 | 245,255 | - |
| 41 | Las Vegas, NV | $74,815 | $49,000 | 632,912 | 4 |
| 42 | Bakersfield, CA | $98,831 | $65,000 | 376,380 | - |
| 43 | San Diego, CA | $92,752 | $63,000 | 1,406,630 | 12 |
| 44 | Nashville, TN | $72,759 | $50,000 | 660,388 | - |
| 45 | Memphis, TN | $71,731 | $49,000 | 652,717 | - |
| 46 | Omaha, NE | $67,022 | $46,000 | 446,970 | 8 |
| 47 | Santa Ana, CA | $95,260 | $64,000 | 334,217 | - |
| 48 | Fort Worth, TX | $75,389 | $51,000 | 854,113 | - |
| 49 | Arlington, TX | $75,355 | $51,000 | 392,772 | - |
| 50 | Laredo, TX | $75,722 | $52,000 | 257,156 | - |
Highest paying cities for facilities project managers
| Rank | City | Avg. facilities project manager salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Jose, CA | $102,352 |
| 2 | New York, NY | $94,087 |
| 3 | Durham, NC | $86,152 |
| 4 | Laurel, MD | $83,888 |
| 5 | Eugene, OR | $83,068 |
| 6 | Columbus, OH | $78,435 |
| 7 | Seattle, WA | $78,357 |
| 8 | Philadelphia, PA | $76,741 |
| 9 | Austin, TX | $76,521 |
| 10 | McLean, VA | $75,670 |
| 11 | Boston, MA | $75,521 |
| 12 | Nashua, NH | $75,509 |
| 13 | Chicago, IL | $74,982 |
| 14 | Knoxville, TN | $73,927 |
| 15 | Tampa, FL | $73,411 |
| 16 | Minot, ND | $71,812 |
| 17 | Colorado Springs, CO | $70,711 |
| 18 | Washington, DC | $70,420 |
| 19 | Flagstaff, AZ | $70,351 |
| 20 | Saint Paul, MN | $67,533 |
Facilities project manager best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common executive management questions.
Search for facilities project manager jobs
Updated January 8, 2025