Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Holland & Knight history
Holland & Knight company history timeline
In 1968 the managing partner at Holland was Chesterfield Smith, who sought to diversify Holland's then mostly phosphate mining business.
In 1973, as president of the American Bar Association, Smith was very vocal in his criticism of President Nixon for his "defiant flouting of law and the courts" during the Watergate scandal.
The Miami office opened with three lawyers, though a 1980 merger with Glass, Schultz, Weinstein & Moss brought the number to 20, as well as four more in Fort Lauderdale (where the firm had also expanded). Other mergers brought a Holland presence in Fort Myers, Sarasota, and Bradenton.
1982: Holland & Knight opens an office in Washington, D.C.
In 1986 more than half of the Miami office and eight attorneys from Fort Lauderdale threatened to defect.
1986: A three-person, rotating management committee is enacted.
The firm established its second out-of-state office in 1994, when it opened an office in Atlanta through a merger with Webb & Daniel, trial litigation specialists.
In 1998 growth was immense, involving expansion in Jacksonville and Orlando, as well as new offices in Virginia, Rhode Island, and Boston.
In 2001 Holland & Knight was ranked the fifth largest United States law firm.
2001: McBride resigns as managing partner; Feagin takes his place.
In 2002 the firm expanded its practices in Seattle and Chicago.
"Tribute to a Titan of the Law: Chesterfield Smith," Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, August 2003.
Rate Holland & Knight's efforts to communicate its history to employees.
Holland & Knight jobs
Do you work at Holland & Knight?
Is Holland & Knight's vision a big part of strategic planning?
Holland & Knight competitors
| Company name | Founded date | Revenue | Employee size | Job openings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foley & Lardner | 1842 | $922.4M | 2,250 | 103 |
| Squire Patton Boggs | 1890 | $1.0B | 7,500 | 24 |
| Covington & Burling | 1919 | $330.0M | 1,600 | 19 |
| Jones Day | 1893 | $2.1B | 6,097 | - |
| Winston & Strawn | 1853 | $985.0M | 2,000 | 2 |
| BakerHostetler | 1916 | $732.0M | 1,771 | 26 |
| King & Spalding | 1885 | $1.3B | 1,927 | 29 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | 1909 | $4.8B | 5,721 | 109 |
| Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld | 1945 | $1.0B | 1,800 | - |
| Williams & Connolly | 1967 | $94.0M | 650 | 3 |
Holland & Knight history FAQs
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of Holland & Knight, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about Holland & Knight. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at Holland & Knight. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by Holland & Knight. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of Holland & Knight and its employees or that of Zippia.
Holland & Knight may also be known as or be related to Holland & Knight, Holland & Knight LLP and Holland & Knight Llp.