Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
From the first, Inco was able to control a majority of the United States nickel market, and had increased its share to 70 percent by 1913.
In 1922, Robert Crooks Stanley began a 30-year tenure as president--and later chairman--of Inco, intent upon building new markets in fields other than munitions.
In 1928, Inco decided it would be wiser to join forces rather than fight over the world's largest nickel mine.
The antitrust action was settled in 1948 when Inco signed a consent decree, agreeing only that it would sell nickel in the United States at fair prices; its worldwide monopoly, however, was beyond the reach of the United States Department of Justice.
After several years of exploration, a major find was made in northern Manitoba in 1956, a field it christened "Thompson" after company Chairman John F. Thompson, successor to Robert Stanley.
1956: Company discovers giant Thompson nickel deposit in Manitoba.
After the 1958 recession, sales of nickel took off once again.
Except in 1974, a boom year for commodities, the nickel market was generally soft for the rest of the decade.
Additionally, Inco's new battery subsidiary was floundering, and in the severe recession of 1981 Inco found itself in deep trouble.
A rebound in the nickel market in 1987 brought the boost Inco needed: an increase in market share to nearly 35 percent and a year-end profit of US$125 million.
Finishing 1993 with sales of only US$2.13 billion, the company had managed to post a profit of US$28 million rather than another loss.
Its operatives had discovered the nickel deposits by accident in 1993.
Responding to what Maclean's called "the largest single source of sulphur dioxide pollution on the continent," Inco launched a series of abatement programs (with a price tag of over $500 million) to substantially lower emissions by 1994.
Though development of so-called telemining was expensive and not always smooth, the company stood to gain a lot in saved labor costs. It continued to investigate high-tech mining, investing in a joint-venture Mining Automation Program in 1996.
Bad weather forced the company's Indonesian mine to shut down for part of 1997, and a strike in Sudbury further chipped away at Inco's profits.
By 2001 costs for developing the mine were estimated at US$1.25 billion, with another US$500 million to build the pilot smelter.
The company's Voisey's Bay property was still embattled by the fall of 2001, though negotiations with provincial governments continued.
Rate Huntington Alloys Corporation's efforts to communicate its history to employees.
Do you work at Huntington Alloys Corporation?
Does Huntington Alloys Corporation communicate its history to new hires?
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of Huntington Alloys Corporation, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about Huntington Alloys Corporation. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at Huntington Alloys Corporation. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by Huntington Alloys Corporation. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of Huntington Alloys Corporation and its employees or that of Zippia.
Huntington Alloys Corporation may also be known as or be related to Huntington Alloys Corporation.