IBM CEO and leadership

I worked as a consultant for the last 20 years.

I can't comment on this since I was not an IBM employee. However, it was great when I worked as a contractor.

Flexibility

Better understanding of the employees needs.

The company I was doing consulting was acquired by IBM.

As a subcontractor it was a reasonable salary

fine

My coworkers and my managers.

My dream company

Too much dependent on Mangers, Managers. Are more than God

Esop

Always inspire and motivated

Yes remove managers as de centralized

Two days prepare for the interview had a panel of six to seven people interview

Less than industry

Its ok for diversity

Respect the new ideas for new thinking

Good salary, nominal raises.

Staggeringly incompetent management. Lots of coercion. Rankings are only for HR hiring numbers, performance means nothing.

Better at spotting snake oil

incompetent.

Remove the CEO, and his peeps

Often people come in through acquisition. I was hired multiple times.

IBM is a tier 2-3 company and pays accordingly.

Serious lack of skills.

Solving problems, leading teams, changing the way things are done

Nothing. No place for a female who is creative

Most were fake in management. Expected to have their mistakes covered by the staff

Had none

Name recognition, initial training program. Truly multicultural company.

Upper management focused on making their bonuses vs what is best for customers, employees and company. Working under constant threat of layoffs. Too focused on meeting diversity quotas vs hiring and promoting for performance. Career advancement: it’s who you know, not what you know. Age discrimination is rampant! You can make more money at IBM’s competitors.

Initial training program. Afterwards, get out and go elsewhere!

Lots of opportunities. Flexible work schedule. If you get with the right manager it's a great place to work.

Management could be an issue. There's a lot of management changes over the years. Resource actions happen every year so there's less job security than there used to be.

The salary and benefits are great.

Base Compensation, strong peer team

Always the threat of a layoff.

Well funded 401k

I worked for IBM for nearly 17 years,I have returned under Global Foundries for 4 years now. Excellent work/life balance. Management and team members are easy to work with. Pay isn't bad either.

Discounts at gyms

None

No future

Stupid management

The best thing is Work-life balance

Too much manager centric

Basic pay and salary benefits

Intellectual stimulation & Training

PMI and IBM project management certification.

Very smart people to work with

Lots of pressure on sales.

Work from home and management of hours

Young team, exploiring new ways of working

traditional

Flexibility, working on various projects, never a dull moment

flexibility to work from home and working under minial supervison

Poor ethics and poor management

travel alowance

Pays well. People are generally nice.

The organization is large, siloed, and nearly impossible to navigate. Very messy and difficult to progress career, especially from the summit program

Work life balance, multiple options to explore as per your interest

manager

flexible timings, multiple resources to learn

culture, work from home, people

nothing, night shift

health benefits, bonuses, perks, trainings, seminars, outings, team buildings

I came to know that this company has good reputation for building better team works among the few. The co- operation among the team members which is the result of the companies direct involvement.

I have no answer for dis-like and may be best answered during exit interview.

working from home! Of course done companies, like us, are always WFH but I've seen on-site companies employ it once a week. It's a great freedom to mix up the work day with chores and other tasks that need to be done within a 9-5 day and hard to do from the office. I think this relieves a lot of "admin stress" and bring more happiness and engagement to teammates.

Its perfection, surety, trust, better support of team, good guideline, better understanding and good future of employee.

pressurizing on work which is every where same . and grouping in team work as partition

good knowledge, better understanding, height of success of company and employee on work from own hard work

Flexibility to work from any location is a great bonus

Career growth is something which I do not have clarity on even after having multiple discussions with my manager. Also there are no team engagement activities or team lunches which help in building a team. Few older employees are really unprofessional with no career aspirations but want to be respected for being there in the company.

Flexibility is the only perk I like.

Challenge and Worklife Balance

Red tape and management slow downs.

Flexibility and independence

Very good benefits as well as company stability. The immediate management tier above me was newer and less established so they were more open to new ideas and more flexible. Good employee compensation package, decent flexibility in work schedule and onsite childcare.

Bad work/life balance because of long hours and long commute to Redmond. Worked excessively long hours some weeks due to workload and deadlines with some of our mid tier vendors.

The health care package was unparelleled and something that I miss very much at my new job at a tech company on the East coast.

It's a great place to advance your career to a certain point. You might not have the top level talent as Facebook or Google, but you have plenty of experienced people that can help you grow your career and skills. There's also reasonable job security for me.

While my team is doing well, the company as a whole has had negative press for the past several years which just becomes demoralizing. Revenue company wide has been down and it seems like there are constant layoffs. It has definitely lost some of the luster.