Best cities for an infrastructure lead
The best cities for infrastructure leads are San Francisco, CA, Glendale, AZ, and Lincoln, NE, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for infrastructure leads vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for infrastructure leads in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as an infrastructure lead or considering a move, this list of the best cities for infrastructure leads to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for infrastructure leads. We also consider how easy it is to find work as an infrastructure lead. While the absolute best city for infrastructure leads is San Francisco, CA, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for infrastructure leads in 2024.
If you're looking for an infrastructure lead job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for infrastructure leads in 2026
1. San Francisco, CA
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 18 Average annual salary: $155,848 Lowest 10 percent warn: $109,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $221,000 Location quotient: 1.98 2. Glendale, AZ
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $120,436 Lowest 10 percent warn: $84,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $171,000 Location quotient: 7.97 3. Lincoln, NE
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $117,927 Lowest 10 percent warn: $84,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $163,000 Location quotient: 1.99 4. Gilbert, AZ
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $119,772 Lowest 10 percent warn: $84,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $170,000 Location quotient: 9.08 5. Raleigh, NC
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $123,234 Lowest 10 percent warn: $89,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $170,000 Location quotient: 1.26 6. Fremont, CA
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $155,264 Lowest 10 percent warn: $109,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $221,000 Location quotient: 1.09 7. Charlotte, NC
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 9 Average annual salary: $120,327 Lowest 10 percent warn: $87,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $165,000 Location quotient: 1.67 8. Columbus, OH
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 4 Average annual salary: $128,340 Lowest 10 percent warn: $91,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $180,000 Location quotient: 0.99 9. Sacramento, CA
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $154,183 Lowest 10 percent warn: $107,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $220,000 Location quotient: 1.05 10. Phoenix, AZ
Total infrastructure lead jobs: 7 Average annual salary: $120,371 Lowest 10 percent warn: $84,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $171,000 Location quotient: 1.23
Choose from 10+ customizable infrastructure lead resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use infrastructure lead resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your infrastructure lead resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for infrastructure leads
- San Francisco, CA
- Glendale, AZ
- Lincoln, NE
- Gilbert, AZ
- Raleigh, NC
- Fremont, CA
- Charlotte, NC
- Columbus, OH
- Sacramento, CA
- Phoenix, AZ
- (18 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (2 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (2 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (2 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (3 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (2 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (9 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (4 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (2 infrastructure lead jobs)
- (7 infrastructure lead jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for an infrastructure lead
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $155,848 | $109,000 | 870,887 | 18 |
| 2 | Glendale, AZ | $120,436 | $84,000 | 245,895 | 2 |
| 3 | Lincoln, NE | $117,927 | $84,000 | 280,364 | 2 |
| 4 | Gilbert, AZ | $119,772 | $84,000 | 237,133 | 2 |
| 5 | Raleigh, NC | $123,234 | $89,000 | 458,880 | 3 |
| 6 | Fremont, CA | $155,264 | $109,000 | 233,136 | 2 |
| 7 | Charlotte, NC | $120,327 | $87,000 | 842,051 | 9 |
| 8 | Columbus, OH | $128,340 | $91,000 | 860,090 | 4 |
| 9 | Sacramento, CA | $154,183 | $107,000 | 495,234 | 2 |
| 10 | Phoenix, AZ | $120,371 | $84,000 | 1,615,017 | 7 |
| 11 | Cleveland, OH | $130,533 | $92,000 | 385,809 | 1 |
| 12 | Toledo, OH | $128,518 | $91,000 | 278,508 | - |
| 13 | San Jose, CA | $155,145 | $108,000 | 1,025,350 | 5 |
| 14 | Cincinnati, OH | $125,870 | $90,000 | 298,800 | - |
| 15 | Philadelphia, PA | $116,585 | $83,000 | 1,567,872 | 4 |
| 16 | Oakland, CA | $155,574 | $109,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 17 | Irving, TX | $111,956 | $80,000 | 238,289 | 12 |
| 18 | Durham, NC | $123,261 | $89,000 | 263,016 | - |
| 19 | Stockton, CA | $154,293 | $107,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 20 | Greensboro, NC | $122,494 | $88,000 | 287,027 | - |
| 21 | Reno, NV | $123,452 | $85,000 | 245,255 | - |
| 22 | Winston-Salem, NC | $122,000 | $88,000 | 242,203 | - |
| 23 | Fresno, CA | $152,243 | $106,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 24 | Bakersfield, CA | $149,379 | $104,000 | 376,380 | - |
| 25 | Las Vegas, NV | $117,935 | $81,000 | 632,912 | - |
| 26 | Omaha, NE | $118,218 | $85,000 | 446,970 | - |
| 27 | North Las Vegas, NV | $117,614 | $81,000 | 238,702 | - |
| 28 | Pittsburgh, PA | $112,647 | $80,000 | 303,625 | - |
| 29 | Scottsdale, AZ | $120,246 | $84,000 | 246,645 | - |
| 30 | Chandler, AZ | $119,854 | $84,000 | 247,477 | - |
| 31 | Henderson, NV | $117,042 | $81,000 | 292,969 | - |
| 32 | Mesa, AZ | $119,828 | $84,000 | 484,587 | - |
| 33 | Houston, TX | $115,286 | $82,000 | 2,303,482 | 8 |
| 34 | El Paso, TX | $116,276 | $82,000 | 683,080 | - |
| 35 | Austin, TX | $115,125 | $82,000 | 947,890 | 5 |
| 36 | Los Angeles, CA | $144,068 | $100,000 | 3,976,322 | 5 |
| 37 | Laredo, TX | $115,704 | $83,000 | 257,156 | - |
| 38 | Tucson, AZ | $118,348 | $83,000 | 530,706 | - |
| 39 | Corpus Christi, TX | $115,674 | $83,000 | 325,733 | - |
| 40 | San Antonio, TX | $115,413 | $82,000 | 1,492,510 | - |
| 41 | Miami, FL | $111,166 | $80,000 | 453,579 | 4 |
| 42 | Albuquerque, NM | $105,346 | $74,000 | 559,277 | 3 |
| 43 | New York, NY | $131,718 | $93,000 | 8,537,673 | 31 |
| 44 | Dallas, TX | $112,028 | $80,000 | 1,317,929 | 5 |
| 45 | Tampa, FL | $110,778 | $80,000 | 377,165 | 4 |
| 46 | Jersey City, NJ | $116,040 | $82,000 | 264,152 | 6 |
| 47 | Chicago, IL | $115,968 | $83,000 | 2,704,958 | 11 |
| 48 | Long Beach, CA | $142,346 | $99,000 | 470,130 | - |
| 49 | Anaheim, CA | $142,013 | $99,000 | 351,043 | - |
| 50 | Santa Ana, CA | $141,456 | $99,000 | 334,217 | - |
Highest paying cities for infrastructure leads
| Rank | City | Avg. infrastructure lead salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $155,848 |
| 2 | New York, NY | $131,718 |
| 3 | Columbus, OH | $128,340 |
| 4 | Durham, NC | $123,261 |
| 5 | Glendale, AZ | $120,436 |
| 6 | Seattle, WA | $118,302 |
| 7 | Philadelphia, PA | $116,585 |
| 8 | Jersey City, NJ | $116,040 |
| 9 | Chicago, IL | $115,968 |
| 10 | Columbia, MD | $115,630 |
| 11 | Houston, TX | $115,286 |
| 12 | Miami, FL | $111,166 |
| 13 | Boston, MA | $108,265 |
| 14 | Albuquerque, NM | $105,346 |
| 15 | Huntsville, AL | $103,381 |
| 16 | Washington, DC | $103,176 |
| 17 | Minneapolis, MN | $101,800 |
| 18 | Atlanta, GA | $101,511 |
| 19 | Arlington, VA | $100,227 |
| 20 | Saint Louis, MO | $99,400 |
Infrastructure lead best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common computer and mathematical questions.
Search for infrastructure lead jobs
Updated January 8, 2025