October 5, 2021
Given the change of course that has happened in the world, we wanted to provide expert opinions on what aspiring graduates can do to start off their careers in an uncertain economic climate. We wanted to know what skills will be more important, where the economy is doing relatively well, and if there will be any lasting effects on the job market.
Companies are looking for candidates that can handle the new responsibilities of the job market. Recent graduates actually have an advantage because they are comfortable using newer technologies and have been communicating virtually their whole lives. They can take what they've learned and apply it immediately.
We spoke to professors and experts from several universities and companies to get their opinions on where the job market for recent graduates is heading, as well as how young graduates entering the industry can be adequately prepared. Here are their thoughts.
University of San Francisco
Southern Connecticut State University
Pacific Lutheran University
University of Pittsburgh
Wofford College
University of Washington
Drexel University
California Lutheran University
University of Colorado Denver
Bethel University
Ithaca College
Nebraska Wesleyan University
The University of Texas at Arlington
Johns Hopkins University
Roanoke College
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Lewis University
Augsburg University
Gonzaga University
University of Nebraska at Omaha
Geoffrey Ashton: The "soft" and "hard" skills listed below in Professor Leonard's replies are widely valued when determining the merits of a potential Philosophy Instructor. However, Philosophy Instructors will typically highlight certain specializations and competencies on their resumes. This can include areas of expertise that are organized historically (e.g., Ancient Greek Philosophy, Modern Philosophy, 20th Century Philosophy), culturally (Asian Philosophy, Latin American Philosophy), and more "traditional" sub-fields that are seen to transcend historical, cultural, and other boundaries (Ethics, Epistemology).
Geoffrey Ashton: This and the next question are somewhat difficult to answer since many of the skills that one learns through training in Philosophy are difficult to measure by purely "objective" standards and are widely transferrable to other fields of activity. In this respect, the skills that one develops in Philosophy are by and large "soft." I would include the following as some of the most important "soft skills" in Philosophy: (1) present complex ideas with precision and clarity, both orally and in writing; (2) dialogue with others and engage views that are similar to or different than one's own while maintaining critical distance and open-mindedness; and (3) solve problems in creative ways ("think outside the box").
Geoffrey Ashton: Having given the above answer, I would highlight that the skills that one develops in Philosophy are not purely subjective or impossible (or even difficult) to measure. Philosophy does involve cultivating certain "hard skills"-even if these skills are still widely applicable to fields of activity outside of Philosophy. Among others, the "hard skills" of Philosophy that come to mind are logic and critical thinking (e.g., how to identify and evaluate evidence and arguments).
Geoffrey Ashton: Philosophy Majors actually do very well in terms of salary earnings. Philosophy is one of the highest-earning majors for mid-career salaries (higher even than majors such as Marketing, Biology, and Accounting). One reason for this is that the skills that one develops through Philosophy training are so useful for succeeding in any given profession. Once an employee learns the technical knowledge and procedures required for a given job, they are much more likely to use their knowledge and skills in valuable ways because they have already developed those "soft," easily transferrable skills of Philosophy (e.g., critical and innovative thinking, ability to clearly articulate oneself, capacity to nurture dialogue). It also bears noting that Philosophy is an extremely valuable Major for those planning to go on to Medical School, Law School, and Graduate School generally. Consider that, of all Majors, Philosophy Majors score the highest on the MCAT, LSAT, and the Verbal and Analytical Writing portions of the GRE.
In collaboration with Nick Leonard.
Southern Connecticut State University
Department of Philosophy
Dr. Richard Volkman: The vast majority of Philosophy majors do not go on to teach in the field, but the question is about those few who do, so I will address that. I will also make it clear along the way why there is a misunderstanding in the very title "Philosophy Instructor." We do not purport to be giving anyone simple instructions! I will nonetheless submit to this unfortunate and possibly misleading title :-)
Obviously, the most important skill for a Philosophy Instructor is effective teaching, which is notoriously difficult to document and measure. This is especially true of Philosophy since the key ideas are all essentially contested and subject to heated dispute. One cannot simply give a standardized test with fill-in-the-bubble multiple-guess to discern the effectiveness of a Philosophy Instructor. Being good at Philosophy is not about knowing a bunch of stuff so much as knowing how to interrogate pretensions to knowledge. So, it will not do to measure a qualified instructor by students' mastery of this or that particular doctrine or content. Instead, we look for something that might be characterized as "The Philosophical Attitude." I probably can't do the idea justice in a brief summary, but it mostly consists of a standing disposition to submit every claim to rational scrutiny, including one's own most beloved commitments.
All this is often misunderstood outside the discipline as supposing there are "no right answers," but it is instead a humble response to the readily apparent fact that none of us really know what the right answers are to the questions that really matter. It is precise because we nonetheless believe that there ARE "right answers" that rational scrutiny is so important. It will not do to take the answers to such important questions from authorities or tradition or whatever feels good, since none of these can claim settled knowledge; these profound questions demand a serious inquiry that each of us has a responsibility to perform for ourselves. The excellent Philosophy Instructor helps students to see the value of this attitude for themselves by modeling it in a dynamic conversation.
Thus, the Philosophy Instructor does not Instruct, for she does not claim to know the right answers. This is at the heart of Socrates' defense against the charge that he corrupts the youth: He explains that he cannot corrupt them by teaching false doctrines, for he has no doctrines. In the end, he only knows that he does not know, and this makes him wise. The philosopher (literally, "lover of wisdom") will come to this wisdom by seeing it in action in the person of the so-called instructor.
So, although a background knowledge of the history of philosophical thinking and its many controversies is necessary to lead the conversation in the classroom, the skill that really stands out is a demonstrated ability to lead the discussion in a way that will model the Philosophical Attitude. This usually involves a certain humility and generosity of spirit to coax young minds into the discussion (to give it a name, we might call it the Way of Socrates), but I've also seen brazen and hyperbolic declarations work to provoke students to participate, as in: "You have no free will! Tell me why I'm wrong!" (we might call it the Way of Nietzsche). There are many other ways as well, including mixtures and successive iterations of the aforementioned. Which style is most appropriate will depend on the teacher and the students. This indicates the value of another skill: The ability to discern which style will be most effective with respect to this cohort of students on this topic.
These skills are not easily documented on a resume. In that context, one has to rely on educational attainment, teaching experience, and recommendations to narrow candidates in advance of an interview. During the interview, it generally becomes apparent whether the candidate manifests the Philosophical Attitude and can impart it to students. Even better than an interview is actually observing their classroom performance, which is a typical part of the hiring process, especially for tenure-track positions.
Dr. Richard Volkman: The "soft skills" would be those mentioned above and especially the ability to model the Philosophical Attitude in a way that students can relate to, with the good judgment to know what style of engagement is likely to be effective with a particular set of students. In philosophical research, the "hard skills" predominate, but the fluid interaction in the classroom that allows a conversation to blossom is at the foreground of effective teaching.
Dr. Richard Volkman: The earnest rational scrutiny that characterizes the Philosophical Attitude requires an ability to move between concrete and abstract with precision and clarity. These skills are honed in the rigorous study of classic texts and logic. These constitute the "hard skills" of Philosophy, in my estimation. In rigor and abstraction, they are comparable to math (the logic of mathematicians and philosophers is the same logic). In-depth, capaciousness, and meaning, are comparable to the exegetical and heuristic skills of a literary scholar. Different schools of thought will emphasize some of these hard skills over others, but each of these skills is necessary for sophisticated philosophical discourse of all kinds, including both scholarship and in the classroom.
Dr. Richard Volkman: Most philosophers lucky enough to make a career in the field are relatively unconcerned with earnings. Just getting a full-time position already approaches winning the lottery.
However, Philosophy majors with just an undergraduate degree perform remarkably well, earning more at mid-career than other non-STEM majors (and many STEM majors). These students of philosophy are not usually working in Philosophy, and they were not hired because of their credentials as Philosophers. Rather, the rigorous and critical thinking they have grown accustomed to in adopting the Philosophical Attitude makes them unusually good at creative problem solving and getting "outside the box." These are very marketable skills in a wide range of endeavors.
We don't generally come to the Philosophical Attitude as a means to get rich, but it turns out that careful and clever thinking that keeps its humility before the unknown is a path to wealth. One famous story about Thales, widely considered the first philosopher in the Western tradition, has it that he was once rebuked to the effect of, "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?" Thales got to thinking and realized a plan to buy up all the olive presses in the region during the off-season at low prices, only to have cornered the market in time for the following year's bumper crop. Thus did he respond to the critics of philosophy by becoming rich through the application of careful thinking and insight. The stats show that many Philosophy BAs regularly accomplish this in their own various careers and market endeavors.
There are probably better and more recent stats on this, but the claim about the earning power of the Philosophy BA is documented at https://www.theatlantic.com/notes/2015/09/philosophy-majors-out-earn-other-humanities/403555/.
Pacific Lutheran University
Philosophy Department
Mike Schleeter: At a Liberal Arts institution like PLU, the skills that most stand out on Professor of Philosophy resumes are 1) teaching skills and 2) research skills. These skills are best evidenced by teaching evaluations and scholarly publications/presentations, respectively.
Mike Schleeter: The most important soft skills include the ability to explore and explain complex ideas in understandable and compelling ways to students at different levels of exposure to the discipline and the ability to formulate research projects and bring them to fruition.
Mike Schleeter: The most important hard skill, particularly in the context of the pandemic, is the ability to deliver course content effectively in an online modality.
Mike Schleeter: The soft skills described above are necessary for the achievement of both tenure and promotion and their associated increases in rank and compensation.
University of Pittsburgh
Department of History and Philosophy of Science
Paolo Palmieri: Broadness of views, knowledge of classical and modern languages, diversity in teaching style, and philosophical thought.
Paolo Palmieri: Being a lover of minds and of bodies.
Paolo Palmieri: Access to primary sources in their original languages
Paolo Palmieri: The higher the salary you earn in philosophy, the lower the chances of being a great philosopher.
Wofford College
Philosophy Department
Dr. Nancy Michelle Williams: Evidence of clear communication skills. The ability to articulate complex ideas, questions, and different perspectives is key to effective teaching/instruction in philosophy.
Dr. Nancy Michelle Williams: Collegiality and the ability to work effectively with others. Emotional intelligence, adaptability, self-discipline, and good time management are important too.
Dr. Nancy Michelle Williams: Computer/digital literacy, problem-solving, and reading comprehension skills.
Dr. Nancy Michelle Williams: The ability to think outside the box and develop unique perspectives. In an increasingly global economy, the ability to think critically about real-world multicultural issues is advantageous. According to the American Philosophical Association, "Data gathered by PayScale from the 2016-2017 academic year shows that people with bachelor's degrees in philosophy tend to earn more over their lifetime than people with degrees in any other humanities field." https://www.apaonline.org/page/data
University of Washington
Department of Philosophy
Colin Marshall: A background in ethics, analytical skills, and concrete industry-specific skills is one winning combination. Many of our most successful alums from UW are double-majors, combining philosophy with another major such as computer science. However, quite a few of our graduates go onto law school, and they tend to do very well in their law school applications, even with a pretty narrow focus on philosophy.
Colin Marshall: I'm not sure if a background in ethics is a soft skill, but a combination of academic experience with ethics and interpersonal work can be a huge asset.
Colin Marshall: All philosophy graduates from UW have some proficiency in logic, which is often useful for technical work. Of course, programming abilities are highly in demand these days. Philosophy doesn't teach those directly, but it compliments them since much of programming, like philosophy, is a matter of going back and forth between formal and informal languages.
Colin Marshall: Among students with a philosophy BA, the highest earners on average are those who go into law school. Philosophy teaches analytic skills that are very useful for the LSAT. Speaking more broadly, though, philosophy encourages students to identify and critically analyze complex structures - something that is useful in any organization.
Drexel University
Department of English & Philosophy
Peter Amato Ph.D.: Philosophy Instructors need to have expertise in the specific areas they are supposed to teach based on MA or Ph.D. level research at an accredited university. They should also have some experience teaching at the appropriate level, depending on the audience.
Peter Amato Ph.D.: Teaching Philosophy requires that one be a careful listener and a clear speaker. One must have the patience to hear and work with students from where they are in understanding an idea or not. Conceptual thinking doesn't come easily, and many students have not had much exposure to it before entering the classroom.
Peter Amato Ph.D.: It depends on the teaching environment. A good Philosophy Instructor should be able to teach effectively with nothing more than chalk and a blackboard.
Peter Amato Ph.D.: One can sometimes earn a reasonable income from teaching as an adjunct, but pay varies widely from school to school, and usually, there are no benefits. People do not become Philosophy Instructors because they expect to earn a lot of money but because it is a valuable and rewarding endeavor in itself and because it is part of the usual path toward a terminal degree and becoming a university Assistant Professor.
California Lutheran University
Philosophy Department
Brian Collins Ph.D.: At a teaching-focused institution (small liberal arts college/university, community college, etc.) or for a teaching-focused position (adjunct, instructor, lecturer, etc.), the thing that stands out most on resumes (CVs) is teaching experience. Suppose you are applying for a position where the primary responsibility will be teaching. In that case, the search committee and/or Department Chair want to see that you have a strong record of teaching the types of classes they are looking for the candidate to teach at their institution. This can also be bolstered by compelling student evaluations and colleague/administrator teaching observations. In addition to teaching experience, a clear indication of one's communication skills (written and verbal) and classroom facilitation skills are really important. The search committee and/or Department Chair want an indication that you can communicate clearly with students and colleagues.
Brian Collins Ph.D.: First, I think the term "soft skills" underplays how important these traits and skills are - I prefer to call them essential skills. With that said, the most important of the essential skills are written and verbal communication, authentic listening, critical thinking (including adaptability and creativity), and conflict management. The ability to communicate effectively (both speaking/writing and listening) is essential to being an effective philosophy instructor because one must present difficult material clearly, facilitate discussions of that material, and offer critical and constructive feedback in a way that can be received well. These discussions are also often centered on sensitive topics, so managing disagreement and conflict in a way that is productive to exploring the questions and concepts is crucial.
Brian Collins Ph.D.: There are not a lot of technical skills required to be a philosophy instructor (the essential skills are much more important to be successful in a teaching position), but one of them is helpful is to be proficient with classroom technology (computer, projector, PowerPoint presentations, projecting video clips, document camera, etc.). If the position involves online instruction, technical skills with online software and modalities would also be extremely important.
Brian Collins Ph.D.: Don't get into academic philosophy if you are looking to get rich. However, if you can become a master teacher (see again the essential skills I discussed above), then you can be an asset to any department that needs classes taught. One of the essential skills I mentioned above was critical thinking (including adaptability and creativity) - this also includes analytic skills (analyzing and synthesizing data/info). Couples with the ability to present that info in a comprehensible way to everyone else involved with a project are part of what will make you a great teacher and an important part of a philosophy department and college or university.
Candice Shelby Ph.D.: It seems to me, after conferring with my colleagues today, that the biggest trend for our graduating students is to continue to amass credentials. A number of our graduates are hanging on at UC Denver because we have a 4+1 M.A., which will allow our graduates (with the proper planning) to secure a Master's degree with just one additional year of work. Since their expectations regarding the job market are not high, these students plan to spend an extra year in school and hit the market with an extra credential next year. A number of others have been accepted to medical schools, law schools, and one a joint MD/Ph.D. program.
Candice Shelby Ph.D.: This has something to do with advice that I have given, which is not to waste the year, but to use it to secure another credential, and to continue to improve their reading, writing, and analytic skills. Although the funny cultural question is always, "What are you going to do with a Philosophy degree?" CEOs and other high-ranking professionals have stated in numerous business journals and elsewhere that Philosophy majors are among the most flexible and most promotable of their employees. Failing that, we always advise students who aren't sure what they want to do to try filling a year with a nonprofit. Philosophy students often move into this area, and they, perhaps more than some others, are civic-minded and engaged already by the time they graduate. This is a time during which they can try things and see the directions in which their true interests lie.
Candice Shelby Ph.D.: To a Philosophy graduate, as to any graduate, I would tell them to seek work that they love; do not seek a job or financial success as means in themselves. A very low percentage of graduates who head out concerned to secure only those two latter things actually end up with meaningful, satisfying work. As you no doubt know, meaningless work, especially in "do-thing" types of jobs, particularly in mid-management, leads to even lower life satisfaction scores than does manual labor. So, I tell my students that they have broad and strong skill sets, and they never know what they'll be doing in ten years (who would have put THIS year in their 5-year plan?), so they might as well seek work that gives them a sense of purpose and participation.
Sara H. Shady Ph.D.: I think that there will be a desire for workers who are flexible and can adapt to different working conditions and environments quickly. I also think there will be a strong need for employers who are great critical thinkers and able to make ethical decisions. The pandemic has raised many ethical questions such as responsibility to prevent the spread of the virus and responsibility to address issues of lack of equity surrounding who has been hit hardest by the virus, both in terms of health and economic impact.
Sara H. Shady Ph.D.: Critical thinking, ability to collaborate with others, ethical decision making, clear communication. Philosophy graduates will have excel in each of these areas.
Sara H. Shady Ph.D.: Philosophy graduates are able to most career fields in most areas around the US. They work in the healthcare industry, business, public policy, law, education, the nonprofit sector, marketing, and communications.
Craig Duncan Ph.D.: So much is uncertain with this pandemic, so I am not sure what to expect with the job market. If a large majority of Americans take the vaccine, then conceivably life could be back to at least a new "semi-normal" by late summer. And although, tragically, the pandemic has been financially devastating for many people, other people will emerge from the pandemic with significant savings (from vacations not taken during 2020, etc.) and in a mood to spend. So there is a chance that that will boost the economy and fuel new hiring for recent graduates. Let's hope so.
Craig Duncan Ph.D.: I think work experience from summer employment and internships can make a resume stand out. Some evidence of computer skills (e.g., knowing how to use common office software programs like spreadsheets and word processors) is good. And a strong GPA can create confidence in a job seeker's general abilities and motivation.
Craig Duncan Ph.D.: Our students pursue varied lines of work. This is no surprise to us, since the thinking and writing skills that we cultivate in our program are very flexible in nature and will apply to a variety of jobs in which analytic and creative thinking are important - that is to say, most jobs worth having. Recent graduates from our department have gone into such careers as information technology, real estate, non-profit management, communications, library science, and even farming.
Rev. Dr. Jonathan Redding: There is an interesting trend toward people who can do many things well alongside increased specialization. For example, there seems to be space for an increase in specialized jobs in the labor section given the ongoing need (everyone will always need skilled and wise plumbers, mechanics, electricians, etc.). The other side of that coin is that "white collar" employers want people who can think, adapt, and work within a team. Those kinds of critical thinking skills will be invaluable as we navigate "what's next" for big tech companies, banking, politics, and education. Being able to think, read, communicate, and write critically (with a dash of creativity) will become an essential commodity.
Rev. Dr. Jonathan Redding: Find a way to get some computer coding experience and skills in your toolbelt. Make yourself as essential as possible, so take classes or find ways to become conversant in the ever-changing language of coding and programming. If your college offers an introduction to coding class, take it. It will be worth it, I promise.
Rev. Dr. Jonathan Redding: Applying for and getting a job is hard; finding a career is even harder. It takes time, patience, and preparation. Don't be afraid to give yourself time to simply have a job while you weigh and consider other options. Also don't turn down opportunities because they aren't "perfect". People rarely land their dream job on their first try; instead, over time, what was just "a job" can become something fruitful, engaging, and worthwhile.
Kenneth Williford Ph.D.: It seems to me that we are likely to see a very long recession. Once the pandemic is under control, there will, of course, be some recovery of jobs in retail, hospitality, the bar and restaurant industry, transportation, and entertainment. Philosophy majors tend to be, on average, as skilled as anyone else for these types of work, if not overqualified.
Suppose we had a federal government that was less wedded to outmoded ideas about the best way to help the economy recover. In that case, we could see a proliferation of career possibilities in education, community service, and green development. And philosophy majors, perhaps with some post-graduate certifications, are well equipped for all of these sectors. (Of course, they remain the best fit to excel in the legal profession.) The inertia, legitimized corruption, class biases, and lack of imagination on the part of those who make a largescale decisions about the economy will likely pose obstacles here for some time to come. A federal jobs program is an obvious solution. Still, it would be opposed bitterly by those who benefit most from the continued existence of a large pool of inexpensive labor to draw from.
Kenneth Williford Ph.D.: Philosophy majors are trained to think carefully and logically, consider alternative possibilities and interpretations ("think outside the box"), frame and communicate arguments precisely and rigorously, consider relevant sources of evidence critically, and think through the moral implications of everything. These skills are beneficial in any employment. I might add that philosophy majors are also trained in analytical skills that make them a great asset to any company or start-up that needs to develop strategic initiatives, analyze its market situation, navigate its institutional strengths and weaknesses, and evaluate the merits and isolate the flaws of competitors. It is not for no reason that philosophy majors do better on the GMAT than business majors.
Kenneth Williford Ph.D.: "In some school districts around the country, it is possible to find teaching jobs that include philosophy teaching. Jobs literally ""in this field"" are mostly limited, however, to teaching positions at the university level that require an MA or Ph.D. The job ""market"" for academic philosophers has been shrinking for many years and is not likely to recover anytime soon. There are still many more PhDs in philosophy than there are university teaching positions in philosophy. This, again, could easily be rectified by government action.
Creating more jobs for philosophers at both the university and high school levels would be doing the country a great favor. We need the critical thinking skills and moral perspectives philosophy opens up now more than ever. We need people who can articulate the difference between real evidence and pure propaganda and help everyone think through social and economic policies' moral implications. In short, we need to train a generation of people to think critically and with a proper measure of confidence (not too much, not too little). However, I remain essentially pessimistic about the prospects for such an initiative anytime soon."
Richard Bett Ph.D.: In general, the skills that philosophy graduates have to an unusually high degree are writing clearly about complicated matters and analyzing complex reasoning - and responding to it, if appropriate, with a sense of their own. These are pretty general skills that can be of use in many different careers so that philosophy graduates can be found in many other fields.
One thing that's commonly (and correctly) said is that philosophy is about the best possible law school preparation. But philosophy graduates can also be found in work related to computers, for example, and many different kinds of business. Our department recently received a very generous gift from William Miller, who studied philosophy at Hopkins and then became a terrifically successful investor. He credits his financial skills in large part to his philosophy training.
It's also a point of pride in our field that philosophy graduates - at least if you look 5-10 years out from graduation - make more on average than many other areas in the humanities, and even more than business majors. (At least, that was true the last time I checked. You might remember the kerfuffle caused when Marco Rubio claimed that welders made more than philosophers; that was refuted pretty quickly.) FYI, I believe George Soros also studied philosophy.
Dr. Brent Adkins: While you're developing your resume, don't forget to keep developing as a person. Become the person you want to be. Your career will follow.
Dr. Brent Adkins: Automation driven by artificial intelligence will begin expanding through every sector of the economy. Ultimately, this will require rethinking the nature of the work itself.
Peter Graham: I don't think that there are any particular technologies that will become more important and prevalent in the field of academic philosophy going forward (except maybe Zoom if this pandemic continues raging uncontrollably for the next few years).
Peter Graham: I think starting salaries for tenure-track jobs are pretty good overall (but, of course, there is still wide variance with regard to even this), but adjunct and non-tenure-track jobs continue to get pretty poor starting salaries.
Dr. Arsalan Memon: That is a difficult question. I say this mainly because I am biased in my response. I fundamentally believe all young graduates need some necessary fundamental skills (regardless of their chosen major). In the coming years, I think students need: a) critical thinking and problem-solving skills, b) resume construction skills, c) communication skills, and d) life skills.
Critical thinking and problem skills: these skills are essential because they are applicable in all aspects of life, even if we cannot clearly and distinctly see that. For instance, let's say that a student who has majored in chemistry must write a personal statement for graduate school. Just taking this general example, we can see that she would be required to make an argument (understood in the broadest sense possible) to the committee to select her over other equally (if not more) qualified candidates. The student would have to construct a coherent, compelling, and precise narrative to move the readers of her application. Teaching since 2009 and at various universities, I have noticed that a lot of students are not taught such critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Resume construction skills: such skills are quite self-explanatory. A lot of my students who have graduated have asked me to write letters of recommendation for them. Most of the time, they would send me their resume. I have noticed that some students do not know how to properly organize their information in the outline (say, what goes first etc.). Other students do not know what should be included in the resume. Some students do not know how much information per item must be included. In some summaries, I have seen paragraphs and paragraphs. I have witnessed insufficient data (e.g., 2-3 words describing their previous jobs).
Communication Skills: more often than not, a lot of my students struggle with in-class student presentations. I have also noticed that many students do not actively participate in class discussions. I speculate that they are afraid of being wrong or genuinely not knowing the answer to some of the questions. Whatever the source of their silence may be, it does not change the fact that some students are afraid to speak their minds. But lacking such communication skills can play a significant role in the actual interview process (for instance). If students cannot articulate their thoughts clearly and distinctly, especially during an interview, they may be less inclined to hire the person. Thus, we need to empower our students to speak their minds, even if they may be wrong at times. In my opinion, being wrong is part of life. We learn from our mistakes. However, being silent is worse than being wrong because when we are silent, our interlocuters can assume many things about us and our lack of responses.
Life skills: no one teaches us life skills. Regardless of one's major, such skills need to be taught in some way. I do not know how such skills would be taught, but that they should be taught. By "life skills," I mean skills that play a central role in determining the outcome of certain events and actions, especially as they pertain to life as such. For instance, based on my perception of teaching students since 2009, no one teaches students to have contingency plans. No one teaches students that effort does not equal outcome. That is, a student can put all the effort into making sure that a particular event or situation actualizes itself in their favor; the work remains independent of the action, mainly because there are so many factors that shape the outcome (and most of those factors are outside of our control). No one teaches students the skill of resilience. The list goes on. I fundamentally believe that such life skills are essential and that students should be oriented to such gifts.
Dr. Arsalan Memon: With a BA in philosophy or philosophy of law, most students go to graduate school or law school. But students can do other things. There are many factors to consider in thinking about work opportunities (to name two): 1) some funding to pursue graduate work (e.g., grants, fellowships, scholarships, teaching assistantships, research assistantships, etc.) and 2) the economic situation (e.g., because of the current pandemic, a lot of universities are no longer accepting new graduate students). A lot of our students go to John Marshall Law School. Very few students from Lewis continue graduate work in philosophy. I would also add: it ultimately depends on the student's interest.
Dr. Arsalan Memon: In my opinion, I do not see technology impacting philosophy in any fundamental way in the next five years.
Larry Crockett Ph.D.: He is applying what they have learned in school in an actual work environment, such as internships. My son interned at Minnesota Public Radio and later was employed by Verizon, and they cited that experience when he asked why they chose to interview him. Solving problems using an exceptional education is the benchmark-noticing what others have missed because they think too conventionally.
Larry Crockett Ph.D.: Immersion in communication, web-intensive environment. Covid-19 is indeed a turning point in how we will work. We will be immersed in our work, wherever we are (not entirely a good idea), because we will be dynamically linked to other professionals working in a team to solve problems. Negroponte of MIT said, some years ago, that "space is abolished," and that assessment is becoming vibrantly real in this rapidly changing environment.
Larry Crockett Ph.D.: Use of virtual reality to do simulations to solve real-world problems. Empirical science is hobbled by the fact that we cannot prove scientific theories right. But we don't need to. We can simulate problems virtually to determine what makes a situation better-what improves trade, when to teach school children programming, or the optimal level of taxation to grow the economy to lift people out of poverty. Video game sales are exploding because of Covid-19. The skills to generate great games will also be the skills we need to create the virtual realities we need to simulate proposed solutions to problems.
Ellen M. Maccarone Ph.D.: I think young graduates will need to be able to process and assess information quickly and accurately, need to be able to imagine what trends will be realized, given that information, and general critical thinking skills, communication skills (written and spoken), and analytical skills. These are all things that philosophy majors develop in their course work. Much of the specific knowledge needed to work for one company or another will be learned on the job, no matter what field the degree is in.
Ellen M. Maccarone Ph.D.: As for geographic areas, I think the cities and suburban areas are probably the best for work opportunities for philosophy graduates. Coastal cities that have technology companies will often have opportunities. Many might find this surprising, but a lot of the skills that tech companies are looking for are taught in philosophy. There is no one-to-one career path for philosophy majors - they are good at skills that are easily transferable to a wide range of work fields. Additionally, areas with research or writing jobs will be hot, though much of this can be done remotely now, so geography is less important.
Ellen M. Maccarone Ph.D.: I think more collaboration will be able to be done virtually, and people will be more comfortable with that post-pandemic. And as more research materials are available electronically, this will also open up more opportunities. The last way I'll mention is a little different - as people in tech fields realize that they need people who are visionaries about how the technology works in everyday life in human ways, degree fields in the humanities, like philosophy, will be more important because of the mix of skills and the humanizing element they can bring, technology will be impacted by the field, rather than the other way around.
Dr. Laura Grams Ph.D.: Since I advise undergraduates who are headed to law school, I suggest that they remain open to different specialty areas at least until after they have finished the first year of coursework. Before entering law school, students may not be familiar enough with various options or whether they might truly enjoy a particular area of law they had not considered before.
After graduation, it is valuable for both personal and professional development to remain active in professional organizations. Other members will have excellent advice and help you develop a network of contacts in your profession.
Dr. Laura Grams Ph.D.: As a skill for students pursuing legal studies, it may be even more useful to develop familiarity with the tools used to analyze data compiled in electronic documents and records and an ability to interpret metadata.
Dr. Laura Grams Ph.D.: They remain steady, though not all parts of the country are equivalent in this respect. Nebraska has been a suitable environment for job seekers.