Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
PLOS history
PLOS company history timeline
The PLOS organizers turned their attention to starting their own journal, along the lines of the UK-based BioMed Central, which has been publishing open-access scientific articles in the biological sciences in journals such as Genome Biology since 2000.
Although tens of thousands signed the petition, most did not act upon its terms; and in August 2001, Brown and Eisen announced that they would start their own nonprofit publishing operation.
The petition called for all scientists to pledge that from September 2001 they would discontinue submission of articles to journals that did not make the full text of their articles available to all, free and unfettered, either immediately or after a delay of no more than six months.
As a publishing company, the Public Library of Science officially launched its operation on 13 October 2003, with the publication of a print and online scientific journal entitled PLOS Biology, and has since launched 11 more journals.
In 2012 the organization quit using the stylization "PLoS" to identify itself and began using only "PLOS".
One, PLOS Clinical Trials, has since been merged into PLOS ONE. Following the merger, the company started the PLOS Hub for Clinical Trials to collect journal articles published in any PLOS journal and relating to clinical trials; the hub was discontinued in July 2013.
In 2016, PLOS confirmed that their chief executive officer Elizabeth Marincola would be leaving for personal and professional reasons at the end of that year.
In May 2017, PLOS announced that their new CEO would be Alison Mudditt with effect from June.
In 2021, PLOS announced a policy that required changes in reporting for researchers working in other countries as an attempt to address neo-colonial parachute research practices.
Rate how well PLOS lives up to its initial vision.
PLOS jobs
Do you work at PLOS?
Does PLOS communicate its history to new hires?
PLOS competitors
| Company name | Founded date | Revenue | Employee size | Job openings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Science Magazine | - | $16.0M | 171 | - |
| Independent Publications Inc | 1975 | $1.1B | 4,999 | - |
| Bertelsmann | 1835 | $19.1B | 145,027 | 172 |
| Tennis Industry Association | 1974 | $2.4M | 27 | - |
| Caption Colorado | 1991 | $15.0M | 200 | 9 |
| Apress | 1999 | $14.0M | 195 | - |
| Daily Racing Form | 1894 | $45.2M | 100 | - |
| Interweave | 1975 | $530,000 | 4 | - |
| American Law Institute | 1923 | $9.8M | 50 | - |
| John Wiley & Sons | 1807 | $2.0B | 5,100 | 17 |
PLOS history FAQs
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of PLOS, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about PLOS. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at PLOS. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by PLOS. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of PLOS and its employees or that of Zippia.
PLOS may also be known as or be related to PLOS, PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE, Public Library Of Science, Public Library of Science and Public Library of Science (PLOS).