Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
The differences between practice directors and chief technology officers can be seen in a few details. Each job has different responsibilities and duties. While it typically takes 6-8 years to become a practice director, becoming a chief technology officer takes usually requires More than 10 years. Additionally, a chief technology officer has an average salary of $172,989, which is higher than the $137,385 average annual salary of a practice director.
The top three skills for a practice director include strategic direction, project management and cloud. The most important skills for a chief technology officer are infrastructure, cloud, and architecture.
| Practice Director | Chief Technology Officer | |
| Yearly salary | $137,385 | $172,989 |
| Hourly rate | $66.05 | $83.17 |
| Growth rate | 16% | 6% |
| Number of jobs | 39,207 | 124,289 |
| Job satisfaction | - | - |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 68% | Bachelor's Degree, 64% |
| Average age | 47 | 52 |
| Years of experience | 8 | - |
A Practice Director articulates value propositions to prospects, market stakeholders, partners, and clients. These professionals present sales proposals, financial models, and business development materials for complicated projects. Besides exhibiting effective teamwork and leadership and maintaining engagement contract business terms, practice directors also oversee several off-shore and on-shore projects and guide the sales team. These professionals supervise project finances, support contract creation, and draft proposals and work statements. Moreover, Practice Directors develop a sales pipeline to attain yearly sales targets.
The job of chief technology officers (CTOs) is to oversee the technological needs and research and development of an organization. The CTOs, who are like chief information officers, make decisions for a company's technology infrastructure that aligns with the organization's business goals. They must ensure that they are updated on new and existing technologies for them to guide the company's future endeavors. Other responsibilities include fixing issues related to information technology, developing and managing the company's technological resources, and participating in management decisions on corporate governance.
Practice directors and chief technology officers have different pay scales, as shown below.
| Practice Director | Chief Technology Officer | |
| Average salary | $137,385 | $172,989 |
| Salary range | Between $95,000 And $198,000 | Between $105,000 And $284,000 |
| Highest paying City | San Francisco, CA | Seattle, WA |
| Highest paying state | New Jersey | Hawaii |
| Best paying company | AstraZeneca | InPhonex |
| Best paying industry | Professional | Telecommunication |
There are a few differences between a practice director and a chief technology officer in terms of educational background:
| Practice Director | Chief Technology Officer | |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 68% | Bachelor's Degree, 64% |
| Most common major | Business | Computer Science |
| Most common college | Carnegie Mellon University | University of Pennsylvania |
Here are the differences between practice directors' and chief technology officers' demographics:
| Practice Director | Chief Technology Officer | |
| Average age | 47 | 52 |
| Gender ratio | Male, 72.2% Female, 27.8% | Male, 91.6% Female, 8.4% |
| Race ratio | Black or African American, 6.8% Unknown, 5.2% Hispanic or Latino, 10.2% Asian, 12.6% White, 64.9% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.2% | Black or African American, 3.8% Unknown, 3.9% Hispanic or Latino, 7.9% Asian, 7.7% White, 76.0% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.6% |
| LGBT Percentage | 11% | 12% |