Best cities for a records supervisor
The best cities for records supervisors are Reno, NV, Fort Wayne, IN, and Indianapolis, IN, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for records supervisors vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for records supervisors in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a records supervisor or considering a move, this list of the best cities for records supervisors to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for records supervisors. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a records supervisor. While the absolute best city for records supervisors is Reno, NV, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for records supervisors in 2024.
If you're looking for a records supervisor job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for records supervisors in 2025
1. Reno, NV
Total records supervisor jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $50,598 Lowest 10 percent warn: $34,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $73,000 Location quotient: 34.99 2. Fort Wayne, IN
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $51,741 Lowest 10 percent warn: $35,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $75,000 Location quotient: 0.00 3. Indianapolis, IN
Total records supervisor jobs: 3 Average annual salary: $50,040 Lowest 10 percent warn: $34,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $72,000 Location quotient: 6.69 4. Pittsburgh, PA
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $56,512 Lowest 10 percent warn: $38,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $83,000 Location quotient: 0.00 5. Wichita, KS
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $49,441 Lowest 10 percent warn: $35,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $69,000 Location quotient: 0.00 6. Philadelphia, PA
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $59,192 Lowest 10 percent warn: $40,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $87,000 Location quotient: 0.00 7. Saint Paul, MN
Total records supervisor jobs: 1 Average annual salary: $50,832 Lowest 10 percent warn: $36,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $70,000 Location quotient: 4.58 8. Boston, MA
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $55,578 Lowest 10 percent warn: $39,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $77,000 Location quotient: 0.00 9. Baltimore, MD
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $62,451 Lowest 10 percent warn: $41,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $92,000 Location quotient: 0.00 10. Detroit, MI
Total records supervisor jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $48,241 Lowest 10 percent warn: $32,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $70,000 Location quotient: 0.00
Choose from 10+ customizable records supervisor resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use records supervisor resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your records supervisor resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for records supervisors
- Reno, NV
- Fort Wayne, IN
- Indianapolis, IN
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Wichita, KS
- Philadelphia, PA
- Saint Paul, MN
- Boston, MA
- Baltimore, MD
- Detroit, MI
- (3 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (3 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (1 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
- (0 records supervisor jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a records supervisor
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reno, NV | $50,598 | $34,000 | 245,255 | 3 |
| 2 | Fort Wayne, IN | $51,741 | $35,000 | 264,488 | - |
| 3 | Indianapolis, IN | $50,040 | $34,000 | 855,164 | 3 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh, PA | $56,512 | $38,000 | 303,625 | - |
| 5 | Wichita, KS | $49,441 | $35,000 | 389,902 | - |
| 6 | Philadelphia, PA | $59,192 | $40,000 | 1,567,872 | - |
| 7 | Saint Paul, MN | $50,832 | $36,000 | 302,398 | 1 |
| 8 | Boston, MA | $55,578 | $39,000 | 673,184 | - |
| 9 | Baltimore, MD | $62,451 | $41,000 | 614,664 | - |
| 10 | Detroit, MI | $48,241 | $32,000 | 672,795 | - |
| 11 | Las Vegas, NV | $47,588 | $33,000 | 632,912 | 3 |
| 12 | Minneapolis, MN | $50,801 | $36,000 | 413,651 | - |
| 13 | Durham, NC | $48,073 | $32,000 | 263,016 | - |
| 14 | Jersey City, NJ | $55,543 | $38,000 | 264,152 | - |
| 15 | Raleigh, NC | $48,001 | $32,000 | 458,880 | - |
| 16 | Newark, NJ | $55,508 | $38,000 | 281,764 | - |
| 17 | San Francisco, CA | $59,140 | $39,000 | 870,887 | - |
| 18 | Greensboro, NC | $47,255 | $32,000 | 287,027 | - |
| 19 | Oakland, CA | $59,010 | $39,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 20 | Washington, DC | $62,004 | $41,000 | 681,170 | - |
| 21 | Winston-Salem, NC | $46,828 | $31,000 | 242,203 | - |
| 22 | Fremont, CA | $58,868 | $39,000 | 233,136 | - |
| 23 | Hempstead, NY | $54,997 | $37,000 | 759,757 | - |
| 24 | New York, NY | $54,982 | $37,000 | 8,537,673 | 5 |
| 25 | Anchorage, AK | $50,698 | $44,000 | 298,192 | 3 |
| 26 | North Las Vegas, NV | $47,513 | $33,000 | 238,702 | - |
| 27 | San Jose, CA | $58,792 | $39,000 | 1,025,350 | - |
| 28 | Atlanta, GA | $48,645 | $33,000 | 472,522 | - |
| 29 | Virginia Beach, VA | $52,942 | $35,000 | 452,602 | - |
| 30 | Henderson, NV | $47,425 | $33,000 | 292,969 | - |
| 31 | Stockton, CA | $58,366 | $39,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 32 | Islip, NY | $54,761 | $37,000 | 335,543 | - |
| 33 | Milwaukee, WI | $46,024 | $32,000 | 595,047 | - |
| 34 | Oyster Bay, NY | $54,645 | $37,000 | 293,214 | - |
| 35 | Charlotte, NC | $45,047 | $30,000 | 842,051 | - |
| 36 | Sacramento, CA | $58,246 | $39,000 | 495,234 | - |
| 37 | Norfolk, VA | $52,768 | $35,000 | 245,115 | - |
| 38 | Brookhaven, NY | $54,411 | $37,000 | 486,040 | - |
| 39 | Madison, WI | $45,437 | $31,000 | 252,551 | - |
| 40 | Austin, TX | $44,851 | $30,000 | 947,890 | 3 |
| 41 | Laredo, TX | $45,013 | $30,000 | 257,156 | - |
| 42 | San Antonio, TX | $44,912 | $30,000 | 1,492,510 | - |
| 43 | Corpus Christi, TX | $44,821 | $30,000 | 325,733 | - |
| 44 | Houston, TX | $44,702 | $30,000 | 2,303,482 | - |
| 45 | El Paso, TX | $45,425 | $31,000 | 683,080 | - |
| 46 | Cleveland, OH | $43,196 | $29,000 | 385,809 | - |
| 47 | Fresno, CA | $57,003 | $38,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 48 | Chesapeake, VA | $52,442 | $34,000 | 237,940 | - |
| 49 | Fort Worth, TX | $44,308 | $30,000 | 854,113 | - |
| 50 | Arlington, TX | $44,301 | $30,000 | 392,772 | - |
Highest paying cities for records supervisors
| Rank | City | Avg. records supervisor salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $59,140 |
| 2 | New York, NY | $54,982 |
| 3 | Leesburg, VA | $54,070 |
| 4 | Minneapolis, MN | $50,801 |
| 5 | Reno, NV | $50,598 |
| 6 | Indianapolis, IN | $50,040 |
| 7 | Manhattan, KS | $49,842 |
| 8 | Aurora, CO | $49,070 |
| 9 | Atlanta, GA | $48,645 |
| 10 | Richland, WA | $47,722 |
| 11 | Austin, TX | $44,851 |
| 12 | Phoenix, AZ | $43,041 |
| 13 | Saint Louis, MO | $42,280 |
| 14 | Omaha, NE | $41,334 |
| 15 | Tulsa, OK | $40,702 |
| 16 | Shreveport, LA | $40,432 |
| 17 | Hamilton, OH | $39,869 |
| 18 | Pine Bluff, AR | $38,877 |
| 19 | Owensboro, KY | $38,519 |
Records supervisor best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common healthcare practitioner and technical questions.
Search for records supervisor jobs
Updated January 8, 2025