Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Shure competitors
Shure main competitors are Amkor Technology is a strategically located company with a diversified working environment. Employees mention free lunches, transportation, and lodging, and the management is good at recognizing key talents., FormFactor, and DeAmertek.
Competitor Summary. See how Shure compares to its main competitors:
- Pratt & Whitney has the most employees (38,737).
- Employees at Amkor Technology is a strategically located company with a diversified working environment. Employees mention free lunches, transportation, and lodging, and the management is good at recognizing key talents. Earn more than most of the competitors, with an average yearly salary of $101,620.
- The oldest company is Pratt & Whitney, founded in 1925.
Shure vs competitors
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1925 | 4.7  | Niles, IL | 2 | $440.0M | 1,000 | |
| 1962 | 3.9 | Stow, OH | 1 | $15.0M | 294 | |
| 1968 | 4.7 | Tempe, AZ | 6 | $6.3B | 29,050 | |
| 1977 | 3.7 | Lombard, IL | 2 | $34.0M | 350 | |
| 1999 | 4.6 | Tempe, AZ | 4 | $4.2B | 6,400 | |
| 1960 | 4.7 | Fort Worth, TX | 7 | $13.7B | 10,200 | |
| 1978 | 4.7 | Chelmsford, MA | 3 | $656.3M | 3,000 | |
| 1925 | 4.6 | East Hartford, CT | 3 | $16.2B | 38,737 | |
| 2006 | 4.8 | Centennial, CO | 1 | $1.3B | 2,500 | |
| 1993 | 4.8 | Livermore, CA | 13 | $763.6M | 1,676 | |
| 1971 | 4.4 | Milpitas, CA | 2 | - | 376 | |
| 1981 | 4.0 | Fort Collins, CO | 3 | $1.5B | 10,000 | |
| 1973 | 3.9 | Reno, NV | 2 | $54.7M | 106 | |
| 1993 | 4.1 | Redmond, WA | 1 | $4.7M | 80 | |
| 1976 | 4.3 | Sunnyvale, CA | 1 | $65.9M | 330 | |
| 1990 | 4.5 | San Jose, CA | 1 | $273.3M | 200 | |
| 2004 | 4.6 | Suwanee, GA | 1 | $77.0B | 31 | |
| 1999 | 4.5 | San Diego, CA | 1 | $12.2B | 30,000 | |
| 1999 | 4.7 | Windsor Locks, CT | 1 | $6.2B | 17,158 | |
| 2008 | 3.7 | Chandler, AZ | 1 | $3.3M | 45 |
Rate how well Shure differentiates itself from its competitors.
Shure salaries vs competitors
Compare Shure salaries vs competitors
Compare Shure job title salaries vs competitors
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Shure | $77,090 | $37.06 |
FormFactor | $84,370 | $40.56 |
MicroVision | $83,067 | $39.94 |
Amkor Technology, Inc. | $82,674 | $39.75 |
Elo TouchSystems | $81,483 | $39.17 |
Advanced Energy Industries | $81,160 | $39.02 |
DeAmertek | $81,065 | $38.97 |
First Solar | $79,652 | $38.29 |
Pratt & Whitney | $78,016 | $37.51 |
Tessera | $77,987 | $37.49 |
Supertex | $77,623 | $37.32 |
Audio-Technica USA | $77,558 | $37.29 |
Bell Flight | $77,409 | $37.22 |
BASELAYER | $77,384 | $37.20 |
Hamilton Sundstrand | $76,395 | $36.73 |
Brooks Automation | $74,881 | $36.00 |
United Technology Group | $74,582 | $35.86 |
Kyocera Mobile | $74,063 | $35.61 |
Altairnano | $68,438 | $32.90 |
United Launch Alliance | $67,260 | $32.34 |
Do you work at Shure?
Is Shure able to compete effectively with similar companies?
Shure jobs
Shure demographics vs competitors
Compare gender at Shure vs competitors
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Amkor Technology is a strategically located company with a diversified working environment. Employees mention free lunches, transportation, and lodging, and the management is good at recognizing key talents. | 62% | 38% |
| FormFactor | 69% | 31% |
| First Solar | 74% | 26% |
| Advanced Energy Industries | 75% | 25% |
| Brooks Automation | 78% | 22% |
| Shure | - | - |
Compare race at Shure vs competitors
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 71% | 12% | 5% | 9% | 3% | 6.5 | |
| 50% | 22% | 8% | 15% | 5% | 8.8 | |
| 61% | 15% | 5% | 15% | 4% | 9.7 | |
| 57% | 17% | 9% | 12% | 5% | 9.7 | |
| 36% | 20% | 6% | 33% | 5% | 9.9 | |
| 64% | 14% | 6% | 13% | 4% | 8.9 |
Shure and similar companies CEOs
What employees say about Shure's competitors
Good work life balance. managers understand your needs. Great product, brand and products are in high demand by many industries, business environment is strong (strong demand), you would have to be a complete moron to mess that up.
Non-existent opportunities to advance. Senior leadership takes all credit for "wins" but takes zero accountability for failures. Slow decision making, bureaucratic and archaic processes. New CTO is a toxic person and is completely out of touch with the company and markets they operate in. Middle managers are utterly incompetent and do not have a clue with what is going on within their ranks. Pay is dismal. Pay increases do not keep up with inflation. Promotions are not merit-based but on favoritism. Weekends were not long enough to recover from the stress of the week and dealing with all the BS.
Working with talented colleagues. You're wasting your potential staying at this company. Leave and find something better where your talents and abilities will be recognized and rewarded properly.
The CEO and leadership teams are detached from the realities of the company and the market.
Clean house at the top, get rid of 80% of executive staff and replace them with qualified and experienced people. Stop taking credit for and cheerleading around DEI initiatives and focus on achieving results and rewarding the successes of the company with proper financial compensation, rather than pointless 'snack day' and other pizza party BS.
There were behavior-based questions and a phone screen, it was pretty easy. Just be confident and comfortable and make a good connection with the people on the other side of the table.
Poor. Raises did not compete with inflation encountered during COVID and people are leaving en masse, those who were not laid off are looking elsewhere. Culture and company are on a slippery slope in danger of being ruined. It's not the same since the layoffs in April.
It's a pretty diverse demographic.
I'm glad to have escaped the kool aid party.