The Organization’s MissionWorking with others to conserve, protect, and enhance, fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the american people – reflects the value the agency places on working in partnership with others.
Do you work at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
Help us make this company more transparent
I was passionate about working to protect threatened and endangered critters and their habitats.
Morale became a serious problem. Management did not value long-term employees, they systematically harassed upper level employees to force them to quit or be terminated so they could hire entry level folks to do twice as much work as they should be responsible for doing.
I would have said stability and knowing exactly when I was getting a raise or step increase. They also had a good retirement plan with matching funds.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is ranked #8 on the Best Government Companies to Work For in Virginia list. Zippia's Best Places to Work lists provide unbiased, data-based evaluations of companies. Rankings are based on government and proprietary data on salaries, company financial health, and employee diversity.
Research Summary. Using a database of 30 million profiles, Zippia estimates demographics and statistics for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Our estimates are verified against BLS, Census, and current job openings data for accuracy. After extensive research and analysis, Zippia's data science team found that:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has 5,540 employees.
46% of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees are women, while 54% are men.
The most common ethnicity at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is White (65%).
14% of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees are Hispanic or Latino.
10% of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees are Black or African American.
The average employee at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service makes $40,921 per year.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees are most likely to be members of the democratic party.
On average, employees at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service stay with the company for 3.1 years.
Help us make this company more transparent.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employees are most likely to be members of the Democratic Party. The largest donation made to a political party by a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service employee was by Richard Aiken. Richard Aiken donated $6,400 to the Democratic Party.
Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party
|Richard Aiken||Economist||Democratic Party||$6,400|
|Nancy Green||Climate Change Analyst||Democratic Party||$5,025|
|James Kurth||Wildlife Biologist||Democratic Party||$4,750|
|Colleen Fahey||Biologist||Democratic Party||$2,700|
|Julie Lyke||Wildlife Biologist||Democratic Party||$2,600|
|Cheryl Kaye||Biologist||Republican Party||$2,400|
|Sue Braumiller||Hydrologist||Democratic Party||$2,269|
|Alex Bourdeau||Archaeologist||Democratic Party||$1,700|
|William Werner||Fish And Wildlife Biologist||Democratic Party||$1,500|
|Deanna Spooner||Conservationist||Democratic Party||$1,500|
Have you worked at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Help other job seekers by rating U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
|1||Bureau of Ocean Energy Management||$72,276||2|
|2||Biodiversity Research Institute||$64,598||0|
|4||Southern Nevada Water Authority||$62,469||0|
|5||HISTORIC CATASAUQUA PRESERVATION ASSOCIATION||$60,758||0|
|7||California Department of Technology||$50,564||0|
|8||Bureau of Land Management||$47,563||87|
|9||New Mexico Fish & Wildlife Conservation||$44,560||0|
|10||Natural Resources Conservation Service||$44,374||11|
Claiming and updating your company profile on Zippia is free and easy.
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and its employees or that of Zippia.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may also be known as or be related to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and US Fish and Wildlife Service.