Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Unified Power competitors
Competitor Summary. See how Unified Power compares to its main competitors:
- Christie Digital Systems has the most employees (1,501).
Unified Power vs competitors
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 4.4  | Terrell, TX | 1 | $31.0M | 139 | |
| 2001 | 3.9 | Henderson, NV | 1 | $16.0M | 42 | |
| 1963 | 3.9 | Redford, MI | 1 | $23.0M | 163 | |
| 1994 | 3.6 | Pompano Beach, FL | 3 | $740,000 | 121 | |
Quality Uptime Services | 1976 | 3.8 | Brookfield, CT | 2 | $1.8M | 5 |
| 1921 | 4.7 | Riverview, FL | 1 | $190.0M | 650 | |
| 1898 | 4.0 | Edison, NJ | 1 | $70.0M | 200 | |
| 1991 | 4.2 | Minneapolis, MN | 1 | $35.0M | 100 | |
| - | 3.3 | Memphis, TN | 1 | $690,000 | 50 | |
Glory Usa | - | 4.1 | West Caldwell, NJ | 1 | $1.4M | 15 |
Associated Time | 1953 | 3.0 | Dallas, TX | 1 | $750,000 | 10 |
| 1929 | 4.5 | Cypress, CA | 3 | $595.6M | 1,501 | |
| 1978 | 3.9 | Lubbock, TX | 1 | $29.2M | 35 | |
Computers At Work , Inc. | - | 4.0 | Naples, FL | 1 | - | - |
| 2007 | 3.8 | Newark, DE | 1 | $14.0M | 175 | |
Genesis Computer System LLC | - | 3.7 | Gladwin, MI | 1 | $420,000 | 10 |
| 1993 | 3.5 | Santa Clara, CA | 1 | $1.1M | 50 | |
Pc Partner Limited | - | | Overland Park, KS | 1 | $1.4B | - |
Rate Unified Power's competitiveness in the market.
Unified Power salaries vs competitors
Compare Unified Power salaries vs competitors
| Company | Average salary | Hourly salary | Salary score |
|---|---|---|---|
Unified Power | $58,973 | $28.35 | - |
Compare Unified Power job title salaries vs competitors
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Unified Power | $72,537 | $34.87 |
DC Group | $74,653 | $35.89 |
Alpine Power Systems | $72,846 | $35.02 |
Christie Digital Systems | $72,704 | $34.95 |
Quality Uptime Services | $72,465 | $34.84 |
Advanced Power Technologies | $72,377 | $34.80 |
ProAutomated | $72,357 | $34.79 |
Tampa Armature Works | $72,184 | $34.70 |
Associated Time | $72,003 | $34.62 |
Computers At Work , Inc. | $71,769 | $34.50 |
Genesis Computer System LLC | $71,718 | $34.48 |
Pc Partner Limited | $71,687 | $34.46 |
CyberCSI | $71,645 | $34.44 |
Glory Usa | $71,597 | $34.42 |
TRUNO | $71,012 | $34.14 |
Data Cash Register Company Inc | $70,995 | $34.13 |
Nationwide Power | $70,225 | $33.76 |
GUND | $65,198 | $31.35 |
Do you work at Unified Power?
Is Unified Power able to compete effectively with similar companies?
Unified Power jobs
Unified Power demographics vs competitors
Compare gender at Unified Power vs competitors
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Unified Power | 72% | 28% |
| Christie Digital Systems | 77% | 23% |
Compare race at Unified Power vs competitors
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60% | 16% | 16% | 6% | 2% | 9.0 | |
| 46% | 27% | 8% | 15% | 4% | 8.4 |
Unified Power and similar companies CEOs
What employees say about Unified Power's competitors
Job security
Constantly being overused, over promised and underdelivered. They screw employees out of pay constantly, decide they don't want to pay something, or last minute changes, significantly reducing pay. Ownership has tanked, the poor management team tries to hold the team together but constantly is thrown under the bus by the ceo and investors. Office team seams to be a giant cluster of incompetence. Field team tries its best to stay afloat, though undermanned and highly unmotivated when moral is at all time low across the board.
none
Regional management seem to actually value the employees, but are constantly thrown to the wolves by the ceo and investors, when employees are screwed over.
Stop screwing over your employees. Every employee under the CEO knows that the investors are just out for a quick buck and don't care for the employees
Quickly declining. The company used to be at the top end of the industry average, but quickly has fallen near the low end in order to secure investor profits. They have lowered standards that have allowed multiple competitors to quickly pick off employees and greatly increase turn around thanks to far less competitive rates.