Best cities for a water treatment operator
The best cities for water treatment operators are San Francisco, CA, Oakland, CA, and Fremont, CA, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for water treatment operators vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for water treatment operators in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a water treatment operator or considering a move, this list of the best cities for water treatment operators to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for water treatment operators. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a water treatment operator. While the absolute best city for water treatment operators is San Francisco, CA, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for water treatment operators in 2024.
If you're looking for a water treatment operator job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for water treatment operators in 2025
1. San Francisco, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,681 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $114,000 Location quotient: 0.00 2. Oakland, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,574 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $113,000 Location quotient: 0.00 3. Fremont, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,414 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $113,000 Location quotient: 0.00 4. Los Angeles, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 5 Average annual salary: $74,987 Lowest 10 percent warn: $52,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $106,000 Location quotient: 0.77 5. San Jose, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,326 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $113,000 Location quotient: 0.00 6. Sacramento, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,185 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $112,000 Location quotient: 0.00 7. Seattle, WA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $77,491 Lowest 10 percent warn: $57,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $104,000 Location quotient: 0.00 8. Stockton, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $78,112 Lowest 10 percent warn: $54,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $112,000 Location quotient: 0.00 9. Long Beach, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $74,600 Lowest 10 percent warn: $52,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $105,000 Location quotient: 0.00 10. Anaheim, CA
Total water treatment operator jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $74,519 Lowest 10 percent warn: $52,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $105,000 Location quotient: 0.00
Choose from 10+ customizable water treatment operator resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use water treatment operator resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your water treatment operator resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for water treatment operators
- San Francisco, CA
- Oakland, CA
- Fremont, CA
- Los Angeles, CA
- San Jose, CA
- Sacramento, CA
- Seattle, WA
- Stockton, CA
- Long Beach, CA
- Anaheim, CA
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (5 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
- (0 water treatment operator jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a water treatment operator
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $78,681 | $54,000 | 870,887 | - |
| 2 | Oakland, CA | $78,574 | $54,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 3 | Fremont, CA | $78,414 | $54,000 | 233,136 | - |
| 4 | Los Angeles, CA | $74,987 | $52,000 | 3,976,322 | 5 |
| 5 | San Jose, CA | $78,326 | $54,000 | 1,025,350 | - |
| 6 | Sacramento, CA | $78,185 | $54,000 | 495,234 | - |
| 7 | Seattle, WA | $77,491 | $57,000 | 704,352 | - |
| 8 | Stockton, CA | $78,112 | $54,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 9 | Long Beach, CA | $74,600 | $52,000 | 470,130 | - |
| 10 | Anaheim, CA | $74,519 | $52,000 | 351,043 | - |
| 11 | Santa Ana, CA | $74,400 | $52,000 | 334,217 | - |
| 12 | Fresno, CA | $77,215 | $53,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 13 | Riverside, CA | $74,339 | $52,000 | 324,722 | - |
| 14 | San Diego, CA | $73,147 | $52,000 | 1,406,630 | 3 |
| 15 | Bakersfield, CA | $76,397 | $53,000 | 376,380 | - |
| 16 | Irvine, CA | $74,279 | $52,000 | 266,122 | - |
| 17 | Fort Wayne, IN | $51,085 | $36,000 | 264,488 | 3 |
| 18 | Chula Vista, CA | $72,985 | $52,000 | 267,172 | - |
| 19 | Cleveland, OH | $55,274 | $39,000 | 385,809 | - |
| 20 | Toledo, OH | $54,822 | $39,000 | 278,508 | - |
| 21 | Columbus, OH | $54,227 | $38,000 | 860,090 | - |
| 22 | Reno, NV | $57,691 | $40,000 | 245,255 | - |
| 23 | Cincinnati, OH | $53,273 | $38,000 | 298,800 | - |
| 24 | Anchorage, AK | $63,261 | $55,000 | 298,192 | - |
| 25 | Las Vegas, NV | $55,811 | $39,000 | 632,912 | - |
| 26 | North Las Vegas, NV | $55,729 | $39,000 | 238,702 | - |
| 27 | Saint Paul, MN | $54,433 | $40,000 | 302,398 | 3 |
| 28 | Henderson, NV | $55,681 | $39,000 | 292,969 | - |
| 29 | Aurora, CO | $55,193 | $41,000 | 361,710 | 21 |
| 30 | Jersey City, NJ | $63,276 | $44,000 | 264,152 | - |
| 31 | Indianapolis, IN | $50,226 | $36,000 | 855,164 | - |
| 32 | Newark, NJ | $63,260 | $44,000 | 281,764 | - |
| 33 | Omaha, NE | $52,555 | $38,000 | 446,970 | - |
| 34 | Lincoln, NE | $52,064 | $38,000 | 280,364 | - |
| 35 | Portland, OR | $59,621 | $43,000 | 639,863 | - |
| 36 | Minneapolis, MN | $54,436 | $40,000 | 413,651 | - |
| 37 | Milwaukee, WI | $50,779 | $36,000 | 595,047 | - |
| 38 | Madison, WI | $50,579 | $36,000 | 252,551 | - |
| 39 | Chicago, IL | $55,615 | $40,000 | 2,704,958 | - |
| 40 | Colorado Springs, CO | $54,698 | $40,000 | 465,101 | 3 |
| 41 | Glendale, AZ | $47,199 | $34,000 | 245,895 | 1 |
| 42 | Detroit, MI | $47,680 | $34,000 | 672,795 | - |
| 43 | Gilbert, AZ | $47,008 | $34,000 | 237,133 | 13 |
| 44 | Mesa, AZ | $47,023 | $34,000 | 484,587 | 5 |
| 45 | Boston, MA | $57,533 | $41,000 | 673,184 | - |
| 46 | Scottsdale, AZ | $47,143 | $34,000 | 246,645 | 2 |
| 47 | Pittsburgh, PA | $46,618 | $33,000 | 303,625 | 2 |
| 48 | Denver, CO | $55,247 | $41,000 | 693,060 | - |
| 49 | Virginia Beach, VA | $52,618 | $36,000 | 452,602 | - |
| 50 | Norfolk, VA | $52,563 | $36,000 | 245,115 | - |
Highest paying cities for water treatment operators
| Rank | City | Avg. water treatment operator salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles, CA | $74,987 |
| 2 | Albany, OR | $59,510 |
| 3 | Loveland, CO | $55,684 |
| 4 | Moorhead, MN | $54,993 |
| 5 | Middletown, OH | $53,594 |
| 6 | Winchester, VA | $53,297 |
| 7 | Collinsville, IL | $52,517 |
| 8 | Casper, WY | $49,062 |
| 9 | Sterling Heights, MI | $47,758 |
| 10 | Avondale, AZ | $47,196 |
| 11 | Rock Hill, SC | $45,679 |
| 12 | Bozeman, MT | $45,451 |
| 13 | Chapel Hill, NC | $45,385 |
| 14 | Hagerstown, MD | $44,778 |
| 15 | Saint Louis, MO | $44,395 |
| 16 | Bradenton, FL | $43,684 |
| 17 | Carlsbad, NM | $43,178 |
| 18 | Cedar Park, TX | $36,283 |
Water treatment operator best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common production and manufacturing questions.
Search for water treatment operator jobs
Updated January 8, 2025