Best cities for a development geologist
The best cities for development geologists are San Antonio, TX, Houston, TX, and El Paso, TX, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for development geologists vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for development geologists in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a development geologist or considering a move, this list of the best cities for development geologists to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for development geologists. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a development geologist. While the absolute best city for development geologists is San Antonio, TX, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for development geologists in 2024.
If you're looking for a development geologist job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for development geologists in 2025
1. San Antonio, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $149,626 Lowest 10 percent warn: $94,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $237,000 Location quotient: 0.00 2. Houston, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 14 Average annual salary: $148,576 Lowest 10 percent warn: $93,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $236,000 Location quotient: 142.35 3. El Paso, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $151,084 Lowest 10 percent warn: $95,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $237,000 Location quotient: 0.00 4. Laredo, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $149,451 Lowest 10 percent warn: $94,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $235,000 Location quotient: 0.00 5. Austin, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $149,344 Lowest 10 percent warn: $93,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $237,000 Location quotient: 0.00 6. Corpus Christi, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $148,747 Lowest 10 percent warn: $94,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $235,000 Location quotient: 0.00 7. Fort Worth, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $148,104 Lowest 10 percent warn: $92,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $236,000 Location quotient: 0.00 8. Dallas, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 2 Average annual salary: $147,953 Lowest 10 percent warn: $92,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $236,000 Location quotient: 37.33 9. Arlington, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $148,079 Lowest 10 percent warn: $92,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $236,000 Location quotient: 0.00 10. Lubbock, TX
Total development geologist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $148,519 Lowest 10 percent warn: $93,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $236,000 Location quotient: 0.00
Choose from 10+ customizable development geologist resume templates
Choose from a variety of easy-to-use development geologist resume templates and get expert advice from Zippia’s AI resume writer along the way. Using pre-approved templates, you can rest assured that the structure and format of your development geologist resume is top notch. Choose a template with the colors, fonts & text sizes that are appropriate for your industry.
Best cities for development geologists
- San Antonio, TX
- Houston, TX
- El Paso, TX
- Laredo, TX
- Austin, TX
- Corpus Christi, TX
- Fort Worth, TX
- Dallas, TX
- Arlington, TX
- Lubbock, TX
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (14 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (2 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
- (0 development geologist jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a development geologist
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio, TX | $149,626 | $94,000 | 1,492,510 | - |
| 2 | Houston, TX | $148,576 | $93,000 | 2,303,482 | 14 |
| 3 | El Paso, TX | $151,084 | $95,000 | 683,080 | - |
| 4 | Laredo, TX | $149,451 | $94,000 | 257,156 | - |
| 5 | Austin, TX | $149,344 | $93,000 | 947,890 | - |
| 6 | Corpus Christi, TX | $148,747 | $94,000 | 325,733 | - |
| 7 | Fort Worth, TX | $148,104 | $92,000 | 854,113 | - |
| 8 | Dallas, TX | $147,953 | $92,000 | 1,317,929 | 2 |
| 9 | Arlington, TX | $148,079 | $92,000 | 392,772 | - |
| 10 | Lubbock, TX | $148,519 | $93,000 | 252,506 | - |
| 11 | Irving, TX | $147,931 | $92,000 | 238,289 | 1 |
| 12 | Garland, TX | $147,789 | $92,000 | 234,943 | - |
| 13 | Plano, TX | $147,706 | $92,000 | 286,057 | - |
| 14 | Oklahoma City, OK | $122,676 | $76,000 | 638,367 | 2 |
| 15 | Tucson, AZ | $109,942 | $70,000 | 530,706 | - |
| 16 | Glendale, AZ | $109,828 | $70,000 | 245,895 | - |
| 17 | Chandler, AZ | $109,819 | $70,000 | 247,477 | - |
| 18 | Gilbert, AZ | $109,782 | $70,000 | 237,133 | - |
| 19 | Memphis, TN | $100,444 | $62,000 | 652,717 | - |
| 20 | Tulsa, OK | $120,043 | $74,000 | 403,090 | - |
| 21 | Phoenix, AZ | $109,772 | $70,000 | 1,615,017 | - |
| 22 | Mesa, AZ | $109,722 | $70,000 | 484,587 | - |
| 23 | Scottsdale, AZ | $109,621 | $70,000 | 246,645 | - |
| 24 | Toledo, OH | $97,901 | $60,000 | 278,508 | - |
| 25 | Columbus, OH | $97,774 | $60,000 | 860,090 | - |
| 26 | Nashville, TN | $95,462 | $59,000 | 660,388 | - |
| 27 | Cleveland, OH | $98,628 | $61,000 | 385,809 | - |
| 28 | Las Vegas, NV | $102,603 | $65,000 | 632,912 | - |
| 29 | Henderson, NV | $102,466 | $65,000 | 292,969 | - |
| 30 | North Las Vegas, NV | $102,453 | $65,000 | 238,702 | - |
| 31 | Cincinnati, OH | $95,838 | $59,000 | 298,800 | - |
| 32 | Lexington, KY | $96,428 | $59,000 | 318,449 | - |
| 33 | Reno, NV | $101,464 | $65,000 | 245,255 | - |
| 34 | Louisville, KY | $95,618 | $59,000 | 597,337 | - |
| 35 | Philadelphia, PA | $96,048 | $60,000 | 1,567,872 | - |
| 36 | Bakersfield, CA | $120,816 | $78,000 | 376,380 | 2 |
| 37 | Virginia Beach, VA | $111,545 | $69,000 | 452,602 | - |
| 38 | Albuquerque, NM | $100,504 | $63,000 | 559,277 | - |
| 39 | San Jose, CA | $121,213 | $78,000 | 1,025,350 | - |
| 40 | Norfolk, VA | $111,346 | $69,000 | 245,115 | - |
| 41 | Fremont, CA | $120,930 | $78,000 | 233,136 | - |
| 42 | Chesapeake, VA | $111,308 | $69,000 | 237,940 | - |
| 43 | San Francisco, CA | $120,850 | $78,000 | 870,887 | - |
| 44 | Oakland, CA | $120,731 | $78,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 45 | Detroit, MI | $93,999 | $58,000 | 672,795 | - |
| 46 | Fresno, CA | $120,666 | $78,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 47 | Los Angeles, CA | $119,946 | $77,000 | 3,976,322 | - |
| 48 | Stockton, CA | $119,815 | $77,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 49 | Long Beach, CA | $119,690 | $77,000 | 470,130 | - |
| 50 | Anaheim, CA | $119,521 | $77,000 | 351,043 | - |
Highest paying cities for development geologists
| Rank | City | Avg. development geologist salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Woodlands, TX | $148,603 |
| 2 | Oklahoma City, OK | $122,676 |
| 3 | Bakersfield, CA | $120,816 |
| 4 | Fairbanks, AK | $104,328 |
| 5 | Lafayette, LA | $96,608 |