Best cities for a remote sensing scientist
The best cities for remote sensing scientists are San Francisco, CA, Lexington, KY, and Oakland, CA, based on factors like average salary and job availability per capita. Jobs and pay for remote sensing scientists vary across the country, but we've determined the ten best cities for remote sensing scientists in the U.S.
Whether you're starting your career as a remote sensing scientist or considering a move, this list of the best cities for remote sensing scientists to live in will help you decide. These aren't just the best-paying cities for remote sensing scientists. We also consider how easy it is to find work as a remote sensing scientist. While the absolute best city for remote sensing scientists is San Francisco, CA, there are plenty of other great places to consider.
Keep reading to learn more about the best cities for remote sensing scientists in 2024.
If you're looking for a remote sensing scientist job, here are five companies hiring now:
10 best cities for remote sensing scientists in 2026
1. San Francisco, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $108,146 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $177,000 Location quotient: 0.00 2. Lexington, KY
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $83,020 Lowest 10 percent warn: $49,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $138,000 Location quotient: 0.00 3. Oakland, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $107,981 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $177,000 Location quotient: 0.00 4. Philadelphia, PA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $90,223 Lowest 10 percent warn: $55,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $146,000 Location quotient: 0.00 5. Fremont, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $107,714 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $176,000 Location quotient: 0.00 6. San Jose, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $107,566 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $176,000 Location quotient: 0.00 7. Pittsburgh, PA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $85,476 Lowest 10 percent warn: $52,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $140,000 Location quotient: 0.00 8. Sacramento, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $107,548 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $177,000 Location quotient: 0.00 9. Stockton, CA
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $107,328 Lowest 10 percent warn: $65,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $176,000 Location quotient: 0.00 10. Louisville, KY
Total remote sensing scientist jobs: 0 Average annual salary: $81,947 Lowest 10 percent warn: $49,000 Highest 10 percent earn: $136,000 Location quotient: 0.00
Best cities for remote sensing scientists
- San Francisco, CA
- Lexington, KY
- Oakland, CA
- Philadelphia, PA
- Fremont, CA
- San Jose, CA
- Pittsburgh, PA
- Sacramento, CA
- Stockton, CA
- Louisville, KY
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
- (0 remote sensing scientist jobs)
Detailed list of the best cities for a remote sensing scientist
| Rank | City | Average salary | Lowest 10% Earn | Population | Job count |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Francisco, CA | $108,146 | $65,000 | 870,887 | - |
| 2 | Lexington, KY | $83,020 | $49,000 | 318,449 | - |
| 3 | Oakland, CA | $107,981 | $65,000 | 420,005 | - |
| 4 | Philadelphia, PA | $90,223 | $55,000 | 1,567,872 | - |
| 5 | Fremont, CA | $107,714 | $65,000 | 233,136 | - |
| 6 | San Jose, CA | $107,566 | $65,000 | 1,025,350 | - |
| 7 | Pittsburgh, PA | $85,476 | $52,000 | 303,625 | - |
| 8 | Sacramento, CA | $107,548 | $65,000 | 495,234 | - |
| 9 | Stockton, CA | $107,328 | $65,000 | 307,072 | - |
| 10 | Louisville, KY | $81,947 | $49,000 | 597,337 | - |
| 11 | Oklahoma City, OK | $83,879 | $50,000 | 638,367 | - |
| 12 | Fresno, CA | $105,876 | $64,000 | 522,053 | - |
| 13 | Bakersfield, CA | $104,314 | $63,000 | 376,380 | - |
| 14 | Tulsa, OK | $80,689 | $48,000 | 403,090 | - |
| 15 | Long Beach, CA | $100,824 | $61,000 | 470,130 | - |
| 16 | Anaheim, CA | $100,754 | $61,000 | 351,043 | - |
| 17 | Riverside, CA | $100,589 | $61,000 | 324,722 | - |
| 18 | Boston, MA | $91,796 | $56,000 | 673,184 | - |
| 19 | Los Angeles, CA | $101,444 | $62,000 | 3,976,322 | - |
| 20 | Santa Ana, CA | $100,576 | $61,000 | 334,217 | - |
| 21 | Irvine, CA | $100,414 | $61,000 | 266,122 | - |
| 22 | Washington, DC | $104,846 | $63,000 | 681,170 | 3 |
| 23 | Atlanta, GA | $82,540 | $49,000 | 472,522 | - |
| 24 | Wichita, KS | $75,213 | $45,000 | 389,902 | - |
| 25 | San Diego, CA | $98,992 | $60,000 | 1,406,630 | - |
| 26 | Chula Vista, CA | $98,790 | $60,000 | 267,172 | - |
| 27 | Virginia Beach, VA | $88,818 | $53,000 | 452,602 | - |
| 28 | Norfolk, VA | $88,667 | $53,000 | 245,115 | - |
| 29 | Chesapeake, VA | $88,356 | $53,000 | 237,940 | - |
| 30 | Cleveland, OH | $72,557 | $44,000 | 385,809 | - |
| 31 | Saint Paul, MN | $80,288 | $49,000 | 302,398 | - |
| 32 | Minneapolis, MN | $80,160 | $49,000 | 413,651 | - |
| 33 | Islip, NY | $89,100 | $54,000 | 335,543 | - |
| 34 | Reno, NV | $74,896 | $45,000 | 245,255 | - |
| 35 | Brookhaven, NY | $89,294 | $55,000 | 486,040 | - |
| 36 | Oyster Bay, NY | $88,869 | $54,000 | 293,214 | - |
| 37 | Jacksonville, FL | $78,214 | $45,000 | 880,619 | - |
| 38 | Hempstead, NY | $88,747 | $54,000 | 759,757 | - |
| 39 | Glendale, AZ | $75,802 | $45,000 | 245,895 | - |
| 40 | Toledo, OH | $70,765 | $43,000 | 278,508 | - |
| 41 | New York, NY | $88,476 | $54,000 | 8,537,673 | - |
| 42 | Phoenix, AZ | $75,789 | $45,000 | 1,615,017 | - |
| 43 | Orlando, FL | $77,718 | $45,000 | 277,173 | - |
| 44 | Scottsdale, AZ | $75,766 | $45,000 | 246,645 | - |
| 45 | Chicago, IL | $80,120 | $48,000 | 2,704,958 | - |
| 46 | Mesa, AZ | $75,646 | $45,000 | 484,587 | - |
| 47 | Chandler, AZ | $75,644 | $45,000 | 247,477 | - |
| 48 | Columbus, OH | $70,392 | $42,000 | 860,090 | - |
| 49 | Gilbert, AZ | $75,623 | $45,000 | 237,133 | - |
| 50 | Tucson, AZ | $74,973 | $45,000 | 530,706 | - |
Highest paying cities for remote sensing scientists
| Rank | City | Avg. remote sensing scientist salary |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland, CA | $107,981 |
| 2 | Washington, DC | $104,846 |
| 3 | Newton, MA | $91,745 |
| 4 | Arlington, VA | $91,021 |
| 5 | Seattle, WA | $79,005 |
| 6 | Boulder, CO | $77,935 |
| 7 | Melbourne, FL | $77,390 |
| 8 | Beavercreek, OH | $69,193 |
| 9 | Las Cruces, NM | $67,379 |
| 10 | Raleigh, NC | $66,728 |
| 11 | Houston, TX | $63,845 |
| 12 | Saint Louis, MO | $62,897 |
Remote sensing scientist best cities FAQs
Have more questions? See all answers to common life, physical, and social science questions.
Search for remote sensing scientist jobs
Updated January 8, 2025