Advisory engineer vs quality engineer

The differences between advisory engineers and quality engineers can be seen in a few details. Each job has different responsibilities and duties. It typically takes 2-4 years to become both an advisory engineer and a quality engineer. Additionally, an advisory engineer has an average salary of $94,314, which is higher than the $79,672 average annual salary of a quality engineer.

The top three skills for an advisory engineer include API, javascript and technical support. The most important skills for a quality engineer are corrective action, continuous improvement, and ISO.

Advisory engineer vs quality engineer overview

	Advisory Engineer	Quality Engineer
Yearly salary	$94,314	$79,672
Hourly rate	$45.34	$38.30
Growth rate	10%	10%
Number of jobs	41,456	96,838
Job satisfaction	-	-
Most common degree	Bachelor's Degree, 60%	Bachelor's Degree, 70%
Average age	42	42
Years of experience	4	4

Advisory engineer vs quality engineer salary

Advisory engineers and quality engineers have different pay scales, as shown below.

	Advisory Engineer	Quality Engineer
Average salary	$94,314	$79,672
Salary range	Between $73,000 And $120,000	Between $61,000 And $103,000
Highest paying City	Oakland, CA	San Francisco, CA
Highest paying state	Louisiana	Washington
Best paying company	Goldman Sachs	Meta
Best paying industry	Technology	Technology

Differences between advisory engineer and quality engineer education

There are a few differences between an advisory engineer and a quality engineer in terms of educational background:

	Advisory Engineer	Quality Engineer
Most common degree	Bachelor's Degree, 60%	Bachelor's Degree, 70%
Most common major	Electrical Engineering	Mechanical Engineering
Most common college	California State Polytechnic University, Pomona	Northwestern University

Advisory engineer vs quality engineer demographics

Here are the differences between advisory engineers' and quality engineers' demographics:

	Advisory Engineer	Quality Engineer
Average age	42	42
Gender ratio	Male, 92.3% Female, 7.7%	Male, 78.2% Female, 21.8%
Race ratio	Black or African American, 4.2% Unknown, 3.9% Hispanic or Latino, 10.4% Asian, 15.1% White, 66.3% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.2%	Black or African American, 4.7% Unknown, 3.9% Hispanic or Latino, 11.5% Asian, 13.9% White, 65.8% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.2%
LGBT Percentage	4%	4%

Differences between advisory engineer and quality engineer duties and responsibilities

Advisory engineer example responsibilities.

Lead development of lithographic techniques for sub-micron technologies and develop processes to support manufacturing transition from bipolar to cmos.
Develop processes producing features and leverage IBM technology into RF and MEMS devices.
Develop system design budgets for RF gain, noise figure and phase noise.
Design custom ASIC base IR transceiver option cards for PCMCIA, ISA and MCA computing platforms.
Prepare designs for pack columns dealing with distillation, absorption, stripping, and direct contact heat transfer.
Translate customer objectives into PCB requirements.

Quality engineer example responsibilities.

Lead internal and customer 8D iniatives using the 6-Sigma DMAIC approach to problem solving.
Manage and develop QA lab personnel, ensuring reliable food safety and manufacturing quality support.
Give guidance to Apple/Asian SQE's and supplier QA, insuring that all quality requirements are being addressed and achieve.
Lead interdisciplinary teams in addressing and resolving problems utilizing Kaizen event , 8D, and 5-why to arrive at root cause.
Lead project to develop and implement quality and environmental management systems to achieve & maintain ISO 9001:2008 and ISO 14001:2004 certification.
Manage aerospace resolver manufacturing transfer from out-of-state acquisition.

Advisory engineer vs quality engineer skills

Common advisory engineer skills

API, 23%
JavaScript, 17%
Technical Support, 7%
Technical Leadership, 6%
Development Environment, 6%
Java, 5%

Common quality engineer skills

Corrective Action, 7%
Continuous Improvement, 6%
ISO, 5%
Quality Standards, 5%
Sigma, 4%
Product Quality, 4%