Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
By 1967, the group, led by the late Arthur Sherwood, had formed and chartered the Chesapeake Bay Foundation to be that private sector voice working on behalf of the Bay.
Early in 1970, with membership at 2,000 and a staff of three, Arthur Sherwood took over as Executive Director and settled on two programs, Environmental Education and Resource Protection, with land conservation an integral part of the protection effort.
The first 20 words of the 1972 Clean Water Act are straightforward and completely impossible to misinterpret: "The objective of this Act is to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation's waters."
Sherwood had a simple but powerful vision for the program: "The place to teach people about the Bay is on it and in it." He put this vision into action in 1973 with the acquisition of a 44-foot workboat and the environmental education center on Meredith Creek near Annapolis that now bears his name.
Something else happened in 1976 that would have profound implications for the future of the Chesapeake.
The late 1980's and early 90's saw more expansion in the Education Program, with a canoe fleet operating in Pennsylvania and the acquisition of Port Isobel Island near Tangier, VA. Participation in the program reached 35,000 people per year.
CBF established a small office in Richmond and began running school trips with a fleet of canoes on Virginia waterways in 1981.
In 1983, EPA issued its report on the Bay Study, documenting systemic declines around the Chesapeake.
In 1983, Foundation staff and volunteers from the BayCARE Chapter established an education center around a 42-foot workboat in Hampton Roads.
Prior to 1983, with rare exceptions, the jurisdictions that make up the Bay watershed made their own plans and programs independent of one another.
Since our formation in 1983, several written agreements have guided our efforts to reduce pollution and restore the ecosystem.
The Chesapeake Bay Program is a unique regional partnership that has led and directed the restoration of the Chesapeake Bay since 1983.
In 1985, the Virginia General Assembly provided a contract for partial funding of CBF's Education Program in Virginia, allowing the Foundation to expand its reach into literally every tidal river in the Bay system.
With Pennsylvania established as a full partner in the Bay cleanup, CBF in 1986 established an office in Harrisburg.
Partners reaffirm the 1987 Agreement.
The 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement set the first numeric goals to reduce pollution and restore the Bay ecosystem.
In 1990, Sumner Pingree took over the Board Chairmanship from Godfrey Rockefeller.
In amendments added in 1992, Bay Program partners agreed to attack nutrients at the source: upstream in the Bay's rivers.
The planning resulted in development in 1996 of nine indicator benchmarks for Bay restoration over the next 10-20 years.
Chesapeake 2000 established 102 goals to reduce pollution, restore habitats, protect living resources, promote sound land use practices and engage the public in Bay restoration.
Chesapeake 2000 marked the first time that the Bay’s “headwater states”— Delaware, New York and West Virginia—officially joined the Bay Program’s restoration efforts.
In 2009, President Obama issued an executive order (EO 13508) that called on the federal government to renew the effort to protect and restore the watershed.
In 2009, the Chesapeake Bay Program began drafting a new agreement that would accelerate restoration and align federal directives with state and local goals to create a healthy Bay.
In 2010, the EPA established the landmark Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL). The Chesapeake Bay TMDL is a federal “pollution diet” that sets limits on the amount of nutrients and sediment that can enter the Bay and its tidal rivers to meet water quality goals.
In a unanimous decision, the Third Circuit affirmed the September 2013 District court ruling upholding EPA's TMDL pollution allocations for the Chesapeake Bay.
In 2014, Chesapeake Bay Program partners incorporated the TMDL into the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement.
The video above was produced for CBF's 5oth Anniversary in 2017.
CBF and EPA release their Midpoint Assessments of progress toward the 2017 goal of having practices in place to achieve 60 percent of the pollution reductions necessary to restore the Bay and its tidal waters.
In 2017, the Bay Program developed the Strategy Review System (SRS), a structured process that applies adaptive management to the partnership’s work toward the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement.
CBF issues its 2019 State of the Blueprint report.
© 2021 Chesapeake Bay Foundation
© 2022 Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Rate how well Chesapeake Bay Foundation lives up to its initial vision.
Do you work at Chesapeake Bay Foundation?
Is Chesapeake Bay Foundation's vision a big part of strategic planning?
| Company name | Founded date | Revenue | Employee size | Job openings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Nature Conservancy | 1951 | $1.3B | 3,000 | - |
| National Wildlife Federation | 1936 | $91.1M | 2,016 | 7 |
| National Audubon Society | 1905 | $99.7M | 600 | 23 |
| Defenders of Wildlife | 1947 | $39.1M | 100 | - |
| Sierra Club | 1892 | $116.0M | 1,433 | 21 |
| The Trust for Public Land | 1972 | $25.0M | 350 | 3 |
| National Fish and Wildlife Foundation | 1984 | $317.8M | 173 | 4 |
| Environment America | 2007 | $2.5M | 80 | 1 |
| Appalachian Trail Conservancy | 1925 | $10.4M | 350 | 4 |
| Resources for the Future | 1952 | $14.6M | 127 | - |
Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of Chesapeake Bay Foundation, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about Chesapeake Bay Foundation. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at Chesapeake Bay Foundation. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by Chesapeake Bay Foundation. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of Chesapeake Bay Foundation and its employees or that of Zippia.
Chesapeake Bay Foundation may also be known as or be related to CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc. and The Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc.