Post job

PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS company history timeline

1800

In the mid 1800's mathematics was first used to analyze the stability of feedback control systems.

1801

The loom invented by Joseph Jacquard of France in 1801 is an early example of feedforward; a set of punched cards programmed the patterns woven by the loom; no information from the process was used to correct the machine’s operation.

1803

In 1803 a pressure regulator was combined with a float regulator by Boulton and Watt for use in their steam engines.

1840

In 1840, the British Astronomer Royal at Greenwich, G.B. Airy, developed a feedback device for pointing a telescope.

1868

In his 1868 paper "On Governors", J. C. Maxwell (who discovered the Maxwell electromagnetic field equations) was able to explain instabilities exhibited by the flyball governor using differential equations to describe the control system.

J.C. Maxwell provided the first rigorous mathematical analysis of a feedback control system in 1868.

1877

The Russian I.I. Vishnegradsky [1877] analyzed the stability of regulators using differential equations independently of Maxwell.

1922

N. Minorsky [1922] introduced his three-term controller for the steering of ships, thereby becoming the first to use the proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller.

1932

Regeneration Theory for the design of stable amplifiers was developed by H. Nyquist [1932]. He derived his Nyquist stability criterion based on the polar plot of a complex function.

1934

With the publication of "Theory of Servomechanisms" by H.L. Házen [1934], the use of mathematical control theory in such problems was initiated.

1940

To study the control and information processing problems associated with the newly invented radar, the Radiation Laboratory was established at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1940.

1941

While working on an M.I.T./Sperry Corporation joint project in 1941, A.C. Hall recognized the deleterious effects of ignoring noise in control system design.

1947

In 1947, N.B. Nichols developed his Nichols Chart for the design of feedback systems.

A summary of the M.I.T. Radiation Lab work is provided in Theory of Servomechanisms [James, Nichols, and Phillips, 1947].

Lauer, H., R.N. Lesnick, and L.E. Matdon, Servomechanism Fundamentals, New York: McGraw-Hill 1947.

1948

The homeostasis of the body is maintained through the use of feedback control [Wiener 1948]. A primary contribution of C.R. Darwin during the last century was the theory that feedback over long time periods is responsible for the evolution of species.

Working at North American Aviation, W.R. Evans [1948] presented his root locus technique, which provided a direct way to determine the closed-loop pole locations in the s-plane.

In 1948, Ivachenko had investigated the principle of relay control, where the control signal is switched discontinuously between discrete values.

1950

In 1950, Sperry Rand built the first commercial data processing machine, the UNIVAC I. Soon after, IBM marketed the 701 computer.

The work of C.E. Shannon in the 1950's at Bell Labs had revealed the importance of sampled data techniques in the processing of signals.

1954

October 1954: 60, 30 and 15 years ago in Control Engineering

1955

More from April 1955: Keep the right kind of records to protect your patentable ideas

Tsypkin used the phase plane for nonlinear controls design in 1955.

1957

Given the history of control theory in the Soviet Union, it is only natural that the first satellite, Sputnik, was launched there in 1957.

1958

Ragazzini, J.R., and G.F. Franklin, Sampled-Data Control Systems, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1958.

1959

The first industrial computer control system used in a factory was assembled in 1959 at Texaco’s Port Arthur, Texas refinery.

1960

The first conference of the newly formed International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) was fittingly held in Moscow in 1960.

In 1960 three major papers were published by R. Kalman and coworkers, working in the United States One of these [Kalman and Bertram 1960], publicized the vital work of Lyapunov in the time-domain control of nonlinear systems.

In 1960 a major advance occurred- the second generation of computers was introduced which used solid-state technology.

Without computers, modern control would have had limited applications. It is fortunate that in 1960 there were major developments in another area- digital computer technology.

1962

By now, automatic control theory using frequency-domain techniques had come of age, establishing itself as a paradigm (in the sense of Kuhn [1962]). On the one hand, a firm mathematical theory for servomechanisms had been established, and on the other, engineering design techniques were provided.

1965

The Ramo-Wooldridge Company created additional advanced process control computers but got out of the commercial marketing of computers about the same time as they changed their name to TRW Inc. in 1965.

1966

Hall, A.C., "Application of Circuit Theory to the Design of Servomechanisms," J. Franklin Inst., 1966.

1969

After entries from DEC, Allen Bradley and Bedford Associates were presented to GM, Bedford Associates, won out with its Modicon 084 programmable controller (PC) in 1969.

With the advent of the microprocessor in 1969 a new area developed.

1970

By 1970, with the work of K. Åström [1970] and others, the importance of digital controls in process applications was firmly established.

A major proponent of classical techniques for multivariable systems was I. Horowitz, whose quantitative feedback theory developed in the early 1970's accomplishes robust design using the Nichols chart.

1973

Dick Morley and his team of engineers at Bedford ended up creating a new subsidiary at Bedford Associates called Modicon as a result of their success with the 084 in 1973 which addressed a lot of additional needs of the marketplace.

1980

With the work on robust modern control in the early 1980's, there is now a technique (LQG/LTR, Chapter 10) for designing robust multivariable control systems.

1985

Allen-Bradley was purchased by Rockwell Automation in 1985 yet their products and software still wear the Allen-Bradley name.

1993

ICON eventually was purchased by Rockwell Automation in 1993 and Taylor Industrial Software was sold eventually to GE Fanuc.

2004

September 2004: 50, 25, and 10 years ago in Control Engineering Stop coining words; single-chip analog and digital signal processor; giants, machine control, and perspective

2005

See Control Engineering 2005 media kit, page 4 at /mediainfo.

2008

The negative growth as a result of the ushering-in of the Great Recession of 2008 has brought about much stagnation over the last several years in the world of industrial automation.

2010

CFE Media forms in 2010 – Welcome Back To CFE Media, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, Control Engineering, Plant Engineering

2012

CFE Media Launches ContentStream in 2012

2014

Monthly histories: 60, 30, and 15 years ago (from the 60th anniversary in 2014

Work at PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS?
Share your experience
Founded
-
Company founded
Headquarters
Alsip, IL
Company headquarter
Get updates for jobs and news

Rate PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS's efforts to communicate its history to employees.

Zippia waving zebra

PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS jobs

Do you work at PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS?

Does PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS communicate its history to new hires?

Zippia gives an in-depth look into the details of PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, including salaries, political affiliations, employee data, and more, in order to inform job seekers about PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS. The employee data is based on information from people who have self-reported their past or current employments at PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS. The data on this page is also based on data sources collected from public and open data sources on the Internet and other locations, as well as proprietary data we licensed from other companies. Sources of data may include, but are not limited to, the BLS, company filings, estimates based on those filings, H1B filings, and other public and private datasets. While we have made attempts to ensure that the information displayed are correct, Zippia is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of this information. None of the information on this page has been provided or approved by PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS. The data presented on this page does not represent the view of PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS and its employees or that of Zippia.

PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS may also be known as or be related to PROCESS AND CONTROL SYSTEMS, Process & Control Systems and Process & Control Systems Inc.