Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Steel Advertising competitors
Competitor Summary. See how Steel Advertising compares to its main competitors:
- PMK•BNC has the most employees (376).
- The oldest company is Hoffman York, founded in 1933.
Steel Advertising vs competitors
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 3.3  | Austin, TX | 1 | $1.6M | 30 | |
| 1984 | 3.7 | Philadelphia, PA | 1 | $9.1M | 125 | |
| 2002 | 3.0 | Lake Mary, FL | 1 | $1.2M | 30 | |
| 1989 | 4.2 | Jacksonville, FL | 1 | $20.0M | 50 | |
| 1983 | 3.7 | Memphis, TN | 1 | $13.0M | 175 | |
| 2010 | 4.7 | Los Angeles, CA | 1 | - | 376 | |
| 1987 | 3.5 | Victor, NY | 1 | $53.3M | 50 | |
| 1993 | 3.3 | Albany, NY | 1 | $860,000 | 50 | |
Cooper-Smith | 1963 | 3.1 | Toledo, OH | 1 | $1.2M | 20 |
| 1987 | 3.3 | Tallahassee, FL | 1 | $1.5M | 50 | |
| 1971 | 3.7 | Columbia, SC | 1 | $8.0M | 58 | |
Love Advertising | 1979 | 3.7 | Houston, TX | 1 | $3.4M | 20 |
| 1933 | 3.5 | Milwaukee, WI | 1 | $8.8M | 100 | |
| 1972 | 3.5 | Costa Mesa, CA | 1 | $3.9M | 92 |
Rate how well Steel Advertising differentiates itself from its competitors.
Steel Advertising salaries vs competitors
Compare Steel Advertising salaries vs competitors
| Company | Average salary | Hourly salary | Salary score |
|---|---|---|---|
Steel Advertising | $56,357 | $27.09 | - |
Compare Steel Advertising job title salaries vs competitors
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Steel Advertising | $72,418 | $34.82 |
PBS SoCal | $77,721 | $37.37 |
PMK•BNC | $77,361 | $37.19 |
Love Advertising | $76,464 | $36.76 |
evōk advertising | $75,338 | $36.22 |
Overit | $74,549 | $35.84 |
The Zimmerman Agency | $73,581 | $35.38 |
Chernoff Newman | $72,773 | $34.99 |
LevLane | $72,093 | $34.66 |
Sullivan Branding | $70,993 | $34.13 |
Dixon Schwabl | $70,982 | $34.13 |
Hoffman York | $70,654 | $33.97 |
Dalton Agency | $70,525 | $33.91 |
Cooper-Smith | $69,929 | $33.62 |
Do you work at Steel Advertising?
Does Steel Advertising effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
Steel Advertising jobs
Steel Advertising demographics vs competitors
Compare gender at Steel Advertising vs competitors
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Hoffman York | 35% | 65% |
| Chernoff Newman | 43% | 57% |
| Dixon Schwabl | 44% | 56% |
| Steel Advertising | - | - |
Compare race at Steel Advertising vs competitors
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62% | 14% | 14% | 7% | 3% | 7.5 | |
| 72% | 10% | 10% | 7% | 2% | 6.1 | |
| 62% | 5% | 22% | 9% | 2% | 6.6 |
Steel Advertising and similar companies CEOs
What employees say about Steel Advertising's competitors
That is a tough one...
For anyone considering collaborating with Steel Advertising, I'd like to share my company's experience to encourage potential partners to be extremely cautious. My company was hired by Steel to repair a website they built for one of their clients. The website had some issues, which led to security vulnerabilities. Steel engaged our services, and after a month of hard work, we successfully resolved the problems. Steel expressed satisfaction with the results, and their client continues to use the site without any issues. Throughout the project, we maintained regular communication with Steel's Executive VP, providing daily reports and discussing the scope of work. Upon completion, we offered Steel a significant discount on our rates and the number of hours worked. The website has been in use and functioning well ever since, with no complaints from Steel or their client. When we sent the invoice for our services, Steel informed us that they would not be paying for 100 hours of our work, stating that the Executive VP who approved the additional hours was not authorized to do so. This came as a surprise, given that the approval was provided in writing. We had asked for purchase orders (POs) for the additional hours, but the Executive VP had informed us that she could not provide a PO and that her authorization would be sufficient. Our attempts to resolve this issue with Steel have been met with zero success. We have tried to offer payment options and have spent months trying to communicate with them, but our efforts have been ignored. Our experience with Steel continues to be challenging, and I advise potential partners to exercise extreme caution. Despite providing our services and a tremendous product, we have yet to receive full compensation to this day.