Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
The differences between engineering analysts and quality assurance leads can be seen in a few details. Each job has different responsibilities and duties. It typically takes 2-4 years to become both an engineering analyst and a quality assurance lead. Additionally, a quality assurance lead has an average salary of $94,758, which is higher than the $81,650 average annual salary of an engineering analyst.
The top three skills for an engineering analyst include screaming frog, digital marketing and google analytics. The most important skills for a quality assurance lead are QA, test cases, and test plan.
| Engineering Analyst | Quality Assurance Lead | |
| Yearly salary | $81,650 | $94,758 |
| Hourly rate | $39.25 | $45.56 |
| Growth rate | 5% | - |
| Number of jobs | 74,578 | 82,242 |
| Job satisfaction | - | 5 |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 71% | Bachelor's Degree, 65% |
| Average age | 44 | 44 |
| Years of experience | 4 | 4 |
An engineering analyst is responsible for evaluating project requirements and determining the efficiency of operational processes and production methods to support deliverables and produce high-quality business outputs. Engineering analysts assess the clients' specifications, including budget limitations and timetables, ensuring that the project strategies meet the clients' expectations. They also identify complexities, as well as potential risks, and develop recommendations to mitigate delays and complications on project terms. An engineering analyst creates comprehensive reports of their findings and suggestions, including their data analysis and other relevant information to improve business functions and maintain strong relationships with business partners.
A quality assurance lead, also known as QA Lead, is responsible for conducting necessary quality tests and analyses for software program and development. As a quality assurance lead, they must take the lead in ensuring quality during development by proactively performing critical evaluations, troubleshooting, and providing precise documentation. It is also essential to identify issues and resolve them as soon as possible. Furthermore, a quality assurance lead must maintain an active line of communication and coordination as most of the work will be in a team setting.
Engineering analysts and quality assurance leads have different pay scales, as shown below.
| Engineering Analyst | Quality Assurance Lead | |
| Average salary | $81,650 | $94,758 |
| Salary range | Between $59,000 And $111,000 | Between $72,000 And $123,000 |
| Highest paying City | San Francisco, CA | San Francisco, CA |
| Highest paying state | New Hampshire | California |
| Best paying company | Meta | Meta |
| Best paying industry | Energy | Retail |
There are a few differences between an engineering analyst and a quality assurance lead in terms of educational background:
| Engineering Analyst | Quality Assurance Lead | |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 71% | Bachelor's Degree, 65% |
| Most common major | Business | Computer Science |
| Most common college | Northwestern University | Massachusetts Institute of Technology |
Here are the differences between engineering analysts' and quality assurance leads' demographics:
| Engineering Analyst | Quality Assurance Lead | |
| Average age | 44 | 44 |
| Gender ratio | Male, 67.5% Female, 32.5% | Male, 63.0% Female, 37.0% |
| Race ratio | Black or African American, 6.2% Unknown, 4.7% Hispanic or Latino, 8.8% Asian, 12.0% White, 67.7% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.5% | Black or African American, 6.2% Unknown, 4.7% Hispanic or Latino, 8.8% Asian, 12.0% White, 67.7% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.5% |
| LGBT Percentage | 11% | 11% |