Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Aurora Imaging Technology main competitors are Fluke, Q-Tech, and A.W. Chesterton.
Competitor Summary. See how Aurora Imaging Technology compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 4.0 | Danvers, MA | 1 | $1.3M | 50 | |
| 1970 | 4.4 | Greenwood, IN | 1 | $2.4B | 120 | |
| 1948 | 4.8 | Everett, WA | 4 | $6.2B | 2,525 | |
| 1949 | 4.4 | Olathe, KS | 1 | $3.3B | 19,280 | |
| 1907 | 4.7 | Durham, NC | 1 | $1.5B | 3,000 | |
Pentair Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. | 1978 | 3.8 | Apopka, FL | 2 | $930,000 | 7 |
MTI-Milliren Technologies | 1990 | 3.6 | Newburyport, MA | 1 | $3.6M | 20 |
| 1909 | 4.1 | New Kensington, PA | 1 | $31.3M | 100 | |
| 1972 | 4.0 | Culver City, CA | 2 | $8.5M | 210 | |
| 2006 | 4.7 | Tucson, AZ | 2 | - | 751 | |
| 1959 | 4.6 | Carteret, NJ | 6 | $427.7M | 229 | |
| 2006 | 4.6 | Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ | 1 | $2.1B | 7,500 | |
| - | 4.1 | Groveland, MA | 5 | $280.0M | 1,000 | |
| 1973 | 4.8 | Irvine, CA | 13 | $1.3B | 7,149 |
Rate how well Aurora Imaging Technology differentiates itself from its competitors.
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Aurora Imaging Technology | $70,066 | $33.69 |
Fluke | $118,268 | $56.86 |
A.W. Chesterton | $84,974 | $40.85 |
Endress and Hauser | $79,504 | $38.22 |
Pentair Aquatic Eco-Systems, Inc. | $75,409 | $36.25 |
Grundfos | $75,181 | $36.14 |
HORIBA | $73,166 | $35.18 |
Q-Tech | $71,736 | $34.49 |
Bell and Howell | $71,694 | $34.47 |
Bacharach, Inc. | $71,602 | $34.42 |
Rigaku Corp. | $70,213 | $33.76 |
MTI-Milliren Technologies | $70,035 | $33.67 |
Oxford Instruments | $69,917 | $33.61 |
Atlas Copco North America LLC | $69,863 | $33.59 |
Do you work at Aurora Imaging Technology?
Is Aurora Imaging Technology able to compete effectively with similar companies?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Aurora Imaging Technology | 62% | 38% |
| Fluke | 64% | 36% |
| Rigaku Corp. | 65% | 35% |
| HORIBA | 72% | 28% |
| A.W. Chesterton | 73% | 27% |
| Bell and Howell | 77% | 23% |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62% | 14% | 6% | 15% | 2% | 8.1 | |
| 63% | 13% | 12% | 8% | 4% | 9.7 | |
| 66% | 11% | 6% | 12% | 5% | 9.7 | |
| 58% | 14% | 10% | 13% | 5% | 9.9 | |
| 56% | 20% | 10% | 11% | 3% | 9.3 | |
| 71% | 11% | 7% | 9% | 2% | 7.7 |