Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Landrum & Shouse main competitors are Stites & Harbison, Zuckerman Spaeder, and Koeller.
Competitor Summary. See how Landrum & Shouse compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1956 | 3.6 | Lexington, KY | 1 | $6.9M | 74 | |
| 1975 | 4.1 | Washington, DC | 4 | $14.0M | 350 | |
Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle | 1989 | 4.0 | Sacramento, CA | 1 | $5.9M | 20 |
| 1964 | 3.6 | Raleigh, NC | 1 | $3.5M | 50 | |
| 1975 | 4.3 | Saint Louis, MO | 1 | $15.1M | 100 | |
| - | 3.6 | Savannah, GA | 1 | $5.5M | 375 | |
| 1897 | 4.2 | Lexington, KY | 1 | $37.5M | 269 | |
| 1832 | 4.7 | Louisville, KY | 1 | $83.9M | 200 | |
| 1908 | 4.9 | Cincinnati, OH | 27 | $210.0M | 890 | |
| 1976 | 2.9 | Altamonte Springs, FL | 1 | $3.3M | 50 | |
| - | 4.3 | Irvine, CA | 3 | $11.0M | 50 | |
| 1998 | 4.6 | Miami, FL | 5 | $53.0M | 130 | |
| 1994 | 4.6 | Los Angeles, CA | 1 | $32.3M | 200 | |
| 1981 | 3.7 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $8.8M | 105 | |
| 1986 | 4.3 | Irvine, CA | 1 | $20.0M | 165 | |
| 1973 | 4.0 | Phoenix, AZ | 1 | $4.9M | 50 | |
| - | 4.1 | Denver, CO | 1 | $16.8M | 50 | |
| 1979 | 4.1 | Las Vegas, NV | 1 | $8.5M | 50 | |
| 1979 | 4.5 | Cerritos, CA | 8 | $54.0M | 366 | |
| - | 3.3 | Buffalo, NY | 1 | $34.0M | 130 | |
| 1979 | 3.9 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $17.0M | 183 |
Rate Landrum & Shouse's competitiveness in the market.
| Company | Average salary | Hourly salary | Salary score |
|---|---|---|---|
Landrum & Shouse | $58,290 | $28.02 | - |
Zuckerman Spaeder | $74,279 | $35.71 | - |
Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle | $54,060 | $25.99 | - |
Tharrington Smith | $52,917 | $25.44 | - |
Kramer & Frank | $36,169 | $17.39 | - |
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC | $43,533 | $20.93 | - |
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Landrum & Shouse | $113,317 | $54.48 |
Stites & Harbison | $102,210 | $49.14 |
Cassiday Schade | $98,413 | $47.31 |
Schuering Zimmerman & Doyle | $93,636 | $45.02 |
Zuckerman Spaeder | $89,890 | $43.22 |
Hudson and Roberts | $84,249 | $40.50 |
Tharrington Smith | $76,226 | $36.65 |
Marquis Aurbach Coffing | $69,521 | $33.42 |
Koeller | $45,484 | $21.87 |
Manning & Kass | $42,984 | $20.67 |
Dinsmore & Shohl | $42,170 | $20.27 |
Quintairos | $40,524 | $19.48 |
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC | $39,418 | $18.95 |
Sanders & Parks | $38,394 | $18.46 |
Kring & Chung | $37,836 | $18.19 |
Jacobs & Goodman PA | $37,050 | $17.81 |
Schiller DuCanto & Fleck | $33,200 | $15.96 |
Bremer & Whyte | $32,018 | $15.39 |
Kramer & Frank | $31,244 | $15.02 |
Jaeckle Fleischmann & Mugel | $26,268 | $12.63 |
Do you work at Landrum & Shouse?
Does Landrum & Shouse effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Schiller DuCanto & Fleck | 22% | 78% |
| Cassiday Schade | 26% | 74% |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | 36% | 64% |
| Landrum & Shouse | 44% | 56% |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84% | 4% | 7% | 3% | 2% | 6.8 | |
| 75% | 9% | 9% | 4% | 3% | 9.7 | |
| 63% | 20% | 11% | 2% | 4% | 6.2 | |
| 64% | 11% | 11% | 5% | 8% | 7.2 |
Over worked, under appreciated, under paid, and subpar benefits. The firm fails to keep up with technology and to change for the better.