Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
NanoString Technologies main competitors are Gilead Sciences, Genentech, and Vertex Pharmaceuticals.
Competitor Summary. See how NanoString Technologies compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 4.3 | Seattle, WA | 1 | $127.3M | 270 | |
| 1997 | 4.7 | Bothell, WA | 3 | $2.0B | 900 | |
| 1987 | 4.5 | Foster City, CA | 9 | $28.8B | 11,800 | |
| 1988 | 4.9 | Tarrytown, NY | 7 | $14.2B | 9,123 | |
| 1981 | 4.8 | Cambridge, MA | 1 | $4.6B | 12,000 | |
| 1981 | 4.2 | Seattle, WA | 1 | $27.0M | 200 | |
| 1891 | 4.6 | Kenilworth, NJ | 31 | $64.2B | 74,000 | |
| 1989 | 4.6 | Boston, MA | 5 | $11.0B | 3,400 | |
| 1992 | 4.8 | Lexington, MA | 1 | $926.4M | 873 | |
| 1979 | 4.7 | San Diego, CA | 3 | $1.7B | 1,500 | |
| 2003 | 4.8 | San Francisco, CA | 1 | $1.0B | 628 | |
| 1976 | 4.5 | South San Francisco, CA | 5 | $166.9M | 13,638 | |
| 1974 | 4.3 | Ipswich, MA | 1 | $43.0M | 350 | |
| 2002 | 4.3 | Piscataway, NJ | 1 | $390.8M | 3,000 | |
| 1982 | 4.4 | Palo Alto, CA | 1 | $380.0M | 1,500 | |
| 1999 | 4.3 | Danvers, MA | 3 | $48.0M | 500 |
Rate how well NanoString Technologies differentiates itself from its competitors.
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
NanoString Technologies | $41,393 | $19.90 |
Vertex Pharmaceuticals | $49,768 | $23.93 |
Merck | $48,675 | $23.40 |
Gilead Sciences | $47,443 | $22.81 |
Regeneron | $46,397 | $22.31 |
Sanofi Genzyme | $45,221 | $21.74 |
Cell Signaling Technology | $45,044 | $21.66 |
ZymoGenetics | $44,079 | $21.19 |
Genentech | $42,921 | $20.64 |
Quidel | $42,895 | $20.62 |
Genencor International | $42,776 | $20.57 |
GenScript | $40,515 | $19.48 |
New England Biolabs | $40,256 | $19.35 |
Cubist Pharmaceuticals | $39,791 | $19.13 |
Medivation | $38,280 | $18.40 |
Seagen | $35,844 | $17.23 |
Do you work at NanoString Technologies?
Does NanoString Technologies effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Merck | 54% | 46% |
| NanoString Technologies | 54% | 46% |
| Regeneron | 54% | 46% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 56% | 44% |
| Gilead Sciences | 56% | 44% |
| Quidel | 58% | 42% |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 56% | 11% | 3% | 26% | 3% | 8.8 | |
| 44% | 20% | 8% | 23% | 6% | 9.8 | |
| 56% | 16% | 10% | 14% | 4% | 9.8 | |
| 50% | 24% | 8% | 14% | 5% | 9.8 | |
| 54% | 15% | 10% | 17% | 4% | 9.8 | |
| 56% | 14% | 7% | 17% | 6% | 9.7 |