Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP main competitors are Allen Matkins, Thompson Hine, and Spector Gadon & Rosen.
Competitor Summary. See how Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP compares to its main competitors:
| Company | Founding date | Zippia score | Headquarters | # of Locations | Revenue | Employees |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | 4.3 | Atlanta, GA | 24 | $11.0M | 50 | |
| 1973 | 4.7 | New York, NY | 12 | $73.0M | 50 | |
| 1911 | 4.8 | Cleveland, OH | 7 | $140.0M | 807 | |
| 1945 | 4.9 | Washington, DC | 11 | $1.0B | 1,800 | |
| 1907 | 4.8 | Philadelphia, PA | 11 | $230.0M | 843 | |
| 1938 | 4.9 | Phoenix, AZ | 7 | $150.0M | 1,000 | |
| 1977 | 4.9 | Los Angeles, CA | 4 | $161.2M | 200 | |
| 1933 | 4.3 | Baltimore, MD | 13 | $29.0M | 350 | |
| 1909 | 4.7 | Stamford, CT | 5 | $84.9M | 350 | |
| 1909 | 4.7 | Los Angeles, CA | 3 | $42.0M | 268 | |
| 1866 | 4.3 | Kansas City, MO | 15 | $39.0M | 500 | |
| 1916 | 4.8 | Cleveland, OH | 17 | $732.0M | 1,771 | |
| 1920 | 4.9 | Miami, FL | 6 | $210.0M | 1,200 | |
| 1817 | 3.9 | Buffalo, NY | 6 | $8.8M | 200 | |
| 1893 | 4.6 | Chicago, IL | 1 | $24.0M | 200 | |
| 1974 | 4.1 | Philadelphia, PA | 1 | $18.1M | 100 | |
| 1945 | 4.9 | Washington, DC | 3 | $180.0M | 575 | |
| 1875 | 3.9 | Salt Lake City, UT | 2 | $11.7M | 100 | |
| 1985 | 4.6 | Minneapolis, MN | 2 | $55.7M | 200 | |
| 1982 | 3.8 | Pittsburgh, PA | 1 | $9.6M | 120 | |
| 1919 | 4.8 | Louisville, KY | 11 | $54.0M | 400 |
Rate Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP's competitiveness in the market.
| Company | Highest salary | Hourly salary |
|---|---|---|
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP | $78,506 | $37.74 |
Loeb & Loeb | $132,607 | $63.75 |
Steptoe & Johnson | $112,437 | $54.06 |
Fox Rothschild | $111,748 | $53.72 |
Epstein Becker & Green | $111,570 | $53.64 |
Spector Gadon & Rosen | $109,385 | $52.59 |
BakerHostetler | $105,132 | $50.54 |
Thompson Hine | $104,508 | $50.24 |
Allen Matkins | $92,565 | $44.50 |
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld | $92,141 | $44.30 |
Jones Waldo | $82,099 | $39.47 |
Snell & Wilmer | $81,582 | $39.22 |
Akerman | $78,376 | $37.68 |
Arnstein & Lehr Llp | $75,233 | $36.17 |
Edgar Snyder & Associates | $74,852 | $35.99 |
wtplaw | $74,446 | $35.79 |
Cummings & Lockwood | $74,308 | $35.72 |
Lathrop GPM | $74,174 | $35.66 |
Frost Brown Todd | $42,440 | $20.40 |
Bowman and Brooke | $42,372 | $20.37 |
Do you work at Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP?
Does Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP effectively differentiate itself from competitors?
| Job title | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP | 33% | 67% |
| Fox Rothschild | 35% | 65% |
| Akerman | 35% | 65% |
| BakerHostetler | 35% | 65% |
| Loeb & Loeb | 39% | 61% |
| Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld | 40% | 60% |
| Company | White | Hispanic or Latino | Black or African American | Asian | Unknown | Diversity score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63% | 11% | 17% | 7% | 2% | 9.6 | |
| 55% | 23% | 12% | 7% | 3% | 9.9 | |
| 55% | 16% | 17% | 8% | 4% | 9.9 | |
| 60% | 15% | 14% | 7% | 4% | 9.8 | |
| 64% | 16% | 10% | 8% | 2% | 9.9 | |
| 52% | 23% | 10% | 10% | 4% | 9.4 |