Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
The differences between directors of information technology security and information technology supervisors, information technology can be seen in a few details. Each job has different responsibilities and duties. While it typically takes 4-6 years to become a director of information technology security, becoming an information technology supervisor, information technology takes usually requires 6-8 years. Additionally, a director of information technology security has an average salary of $128,305, which is higher than the $111,282 average annual salary of an information technology supervisor, information technology.
The top three skills for a director of information technology security include NIST, risk management and risk assessments. The most important skills for an information technology supervisor, information technology are project management, customer service, and database.
| Director Of Information Technology Security | Information Technology Supervisor, Information Technology | |
| Yearly salary | $128,305 | $111,282 |
| Hourly rate | $61.69 | $53.50 |
| Growth rate | 32% | 16% |
| Number of jobs | 119,913 | 75,914 |
| Job satisfaction | - | - |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 63% | Bachelor's Degree, 58% |
| Average age | 42 | 47 |
| Years of experience | 6 | 8 |
A director of information technology security is responsible for managing and maintaining the safety and security of the information systems of an organization and ensuring that the servers provide the highest support to maximize the staff's productivity and efficiency. Directors of information technology security handle the budget and resource allocation for technical solutions development and improving networks' infrastructure. They also evaluate technology recommendations that would generate more opportunities for revenues, profit growth, and business partnerships.
An information technology supervisor of information technology is primarily in charge of overseeing a company's IT operations, ensuring efficiency and smooth workflow. It is their duty to spearhead projects, set goals and objectives, coordinate staff, manage budgets and timelines, perform installations and upgrades, and develop strategies to optimize operations. They must remain knowledgeable of the latest technologies, liaise with external parties, and produce progress reports. Furthermore, as a supervisor, it is essential to monitor the performance of the IT teams, all while enforcing the company's policies and regulations.
Directors of information technology security and information technology supervisors, information technology have different pay scales, as shown below.
| Director Of Information Technology Security | Information Technology Supervisor, Information Technology | |
| Average salary | $128,305 | $111,282 |
| Salary range | Between $90,000 And $181,000 | Between $83,000 And $147,000 |
| Highest paying City | San Francisco, CA | Reno, NV |
| Highest paying state | California | Nevada |
| Best paying company | Capgemini | Mayo Clinic |
| Best paying industry | Retail | Energy |
There are a few differences between a director of information technology security and an information technology supervisor, information technology in terms of educational background:
| Director Of Information Technology Security | Information Technology Supervisor, Information Technology | |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 63% | Bachelor's Degree, 58% |
| Most common major | Business | Computer Science |
| Most common college | Carnegie Mellon University | Carnegie Mellon University |
Here are the differences between directors of information technology security' and information technology supervisors, information technology' demographics:
| Director Of Information Technology Security | Information Technology Supervisor, Information Technology | |
| Average age | 42 | 47 |
| Gender ratio | Male, 90.4% Female, 9.6% | Male, 81.7% Female, 18.3% |
| Race ratio | Black or African American, 9.2% Unknown, 6.1% Hispanic or Latino, 9.0% Asian, 9.6% White, 65.7% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.4% | Black or African American, 6.6% Unknown, 5.2% Hispanic or Latino, 9.8% Asian, 12.7% White, 65.5% American Indian and Alaska Native, 0.2% |
| LGBT Percentage | 9% | 11% |