Explore jobs
Find specific jobs
Explore careers
Explore professions
Best companies
Explore companies
The differences between clinical documentation improvement specialists and health information technicians can be seen in a few details. Each job has different responsibilities and duties. It typically takes 6-12 months to become both a clinical documentation improvement specialist and a health information technician. Additionally, a clinical documentation improvement specialist has an average salary of $64,797, which is higher than the $34,604 average annual salary of a health information technician.
The top three skills for a clinical documentation improvement specialist include patients, patient care and clinical documentation improvement. The most important skills for a health information technician are patients, medical terminology, and customer service.
| Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist | Health Information Technician | |
| Yearly salary | $64,797 | $34,604 |
| Hourly rate | $31.15 | $16.64 |
| Growth rate | 11% | 11% |
| Number of jobs | 66,130 | 120,786 |
| Job satisfaction | - | - |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 44% | Associate Degree, 41% |
| Average age | 45 | 45 |
| Years of experience | 12 | 12 |
Clinical documentation improvement specialists are professionals who are involved in the clinical documentation improvement (CDI) program that incorporates the terminology needed to translate a patient's condition into precise codes. These specialists must investigate complex healthcare reimbursement information to ensure that appropriate documentation is provided for proper patient care. They must collaborate with physicians and medical record coding staff so that they facilitate the clinical documentation improvement process. Clinical documentation improvement specialists must also train members of the patient care team about the documentation guidelines for medical records.
A health information technician is primarily responsible for managing and handling patient information, ensuring accuracy and confidentiality. They coordinate with various health care workers to gather patient data, laboratory results, test findings, and medical histories, encoding them in clinical databases in a timely and efficient manner. They must analyze every information to detect any inconsistencies, performing corrective measures right away. Furthermore, as a health information technician, it is essential to utilize particular software and systems when processing information, all while adhering to the hospital's policies and regulations.
Clinical documentation improvement specialists and health information technicians have different pay scales, as shown below.
| Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist | Health Information Technician | |
| Average salary | $64,797 | $34,604 |
| Salary range | Between $47,000 And $87,000 | Between $26,000 And $45,000 |
| Highest paying City | Madera, CA | Fairbanks, AK |
| Highest paying state | California | Alaska |
| Best paying company | Nuance Communications | Stifel Financial |
| Best paying industry | Health Care | Government |
There are a few differences between a clinical documentation improvement specialist and a health information technician in terms of educational background:
| Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist | Health Information Technician | |
| Most common degree | Bachelor's Degree, 44% | Associate Degree, 41% |
| Most common major | Nursing | Health Care Administration |
| Most common college | Duke University | University of Southern California |
Here are the differences between clinical documentation improvement specialists' and health information technicians' demographics:
| Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialist | Health Information Technician | |
| Average age | 45 | 45 |
| Gender ratio | Male, 15.2% Female, 84.8% | Male, 16.5% Female, 83.5% |
| Race ratio | Black or African American, 9.5% Unknown, 4.2% Hispanic or Latino, 15.7% Asian, 8.9% White, 60.4% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.3% | Black or African American, 9.2% Unknown, 4.2% Hispanic or Latino, 17.2% Asian, 8.6% White, 59.5% American Indian and Alaska Native, 1.3% |
| LGBT Percentage | 9% | 9% |